Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 13, 2026

Methods of Ex Situ and In Situ Investigations of Structural Transformations: The Case of Crystallization of Metallic Glasses
Published on: June 7, 2018
Born-Haber-Fajans cycle generalized: linear energy relation between molecules, crystals, and metals
Leslie Glasser1, László von Szentpály
1Nanochemistry Research Institute, Department of Applied Chemistry, Curtin University of Technology, GPO Box U1987, Perth, Western Australia 6845, Australia. l.glasser@exchange.curtin.edu.au
Abstract:
Classical procedures to calculate ion-based lattice potential energies (U(POT)) assume formal integral charges on the structural units; consequently, poor results are anticipated when significant covalency is present. To generalize the procedures beyond strictly ionic solids, a method is needed for calculating (i) physically reasonable partial charges, delta, and (ii) well-defined and consistent asymptotic reference energies corresponding to the separated structural components. The problem is here treated for groups 1 and 11 monohalides and monohydrides, and for the alkali metal elements (with their metallic bonds), by using the valence-state atoms-in-molecules (VSAM) model of von Szentpály et al. (J. Phys. Chem. A 2001, 105, 9467). In this model, the Born-Haber-Fajans reference energy, U(POT), of free ions, M(+) and Y(-), is replaced by the energy of charged dissociation products, M(delta)(+) and Y(delta)(-), of equalized electronegativity. The partial atomic charge is obtained via the iso-electronegativity principle, and the asymptotic energy reference of separated free ions is lowered by the "ion demotion energy", IDE = -(1)/(2)(1 - delta(VS))(I(VS,M) - A(VS,Y)), where delta(VS) is the valence-state partial charge and (I(VS,M) - A(VS,Y)) is the difference between the valence-state ionization potential and electron affinity of the M and Y atoms producing the charged species. A very close linear relation (R = 0.994) is found between the molecular valence-state dissociation energy, D(VS), of the VSAM model, and our valence-state-based lattice potential energy, U(VS) = U(POT) - (1)/(2)(1 - delta(VS))(I(VS,M) - A(VS,Y)) = 1.230D(VS) + 86.4 kJ mol(-)(1). Predictions are given for the lattice energy of AuF, the coinage metal monohydrides, and the molecular dissociation energy, D(e), of AuI. The coinage metals (Cu, Ag, and Au) do not fit into this linear regression because d orbitals are strongly involved in their metallic bonding, while s orbitals dominate their homonuclear molecular bonding.
More Related Videos
08:04Excitonic Hamiltonians for Calculating Optical Absorption Spectra and Optoelectronic Properties of Molecular Aggregates and Solids
Published on: May 27, 2020
07:11ARL Spectral Fitting as an Application to Augment Spectral Data via Franck-Condon Lineshape Analysis and Color Analysis
Published on: August 19, 2021
Related Concept Videos
Emission Spectra
The de Broglie Wavelength
The Born-Haber Cycle
Bonding in Metals
Energy Bands in Solids
Band Formation:
When atoms are brought close together, as in a solid, these discrete energy levels begin to split due to the overlap of electron orbitals from adjacent atoms. This split occurs because of the Pauli exclusion principle, which states that no two...
Lattice Energies of Ionic Crystals