Application of a triage approach to peripheral bone densitometry reduces the requirement for central DXA but is not

Elizabeth J Harrison1, Judith E Adams

  • 1Clinical Radiology, Imaging Science and Biomedical Engineering, The University of Manchester, Stopford Building, Oxford Road, Manchester, M13 9PT, UK.

Insights

A new triage method using peripheral DXA scans effectively identifies osteoporosis risk in post-menopausal women. However, it proved impractical due to high costs and misclassification, suggesting a need for more cost-effective alternatives.

Area of Science:

  • Osteoporosis diagnosis and management.
  • Medical imaging and risk assessment.

Background:

  • Peripheral dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (pDXA) offers a potential alternative to central DXA for osteoporosis screening.
  • A triage approach aims to stratify patients into high-treat, medium-refer, or low-reassure risk categories.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the effectiveness of a triage approach using pDXA measures and risk indices for osteoporosis risk stratification.
  • To compare the performance and cost-effectiveness of different peripheral scanners and risk indices.

Main Methods:

  • 207 post-menopausal women underwent central DXA and peripheral calcaneal scans using GE Lunar Achilles and PIXI scanners.
  • Four risk indices were calculated from demographic data.
  • Combination algorithms of peripheral measures and risk indices were developed and tested using a triage approach.

Main Results:

  • Peripheral measures, risk indices, and combination algorithms demonstrated good accuracy in identifying osteoporosis risk (ROC areas: 0.67-0.82).
  • The PIXI scanner combined with the OSIRIS risk index showed the best performance, minimizing misclassification and reducing central DXA referrals to 36%.
  • Implementing this triage approach was significantly more expensive (263%) than universal central DXA screening.

Conclusions:

  • The triage approach is effective in identifying women at risk of osteoporosis.
  • The high cost and potential for unnecessary treatment of non-osteoporotic individuals make the current triage method impractical.
  • Alternative, more cost-effective screening strategies are needed for osteoporosis detection.