Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Scoring systems for evaluating ankle function.

Gideon Mann1, Meir Nyska, Iftach Hetsroni

  • 1Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Meir General Hospital, Sapir Medical Center, 59 Tshernichovski St., Kfar-Saba, Israel. drmann@regin-med.co.il

Foot and Ankle Clinics
|September 15, 2006
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Multiligament knee surgical planning checklist: Introducing a conceptual shift in the reporting of surgical management protocols with mid-term outcomes.

Journal of ISAKOS : joint disorders & orthopaedic sports medicine·2026
Same author

Young men undergoing anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with patellar tendon autograft and anteromedial drilling outperform at 5- to 10-year follow-up in terms of graft stability and activity levels compared to those undergoing reconstruction with hamstring autograft and transtibial drilling.

Journal of ISAKOS : joint disorders & orthopaedic sports medicine·2024
Same author

Ipsilateral Quadriceps Tendon-Bone ACL Revision Reconstruction to Address Failed Primary Bone-Patellar Tendon-Bone ACL Reconstruction with Persistent Patellar Bone Defect.

Arthroscopy techniques·2023
Same author

More anatomic tunnel placement for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction by surgeons with high volume compared to low volume.

Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA·2022
Same author

Osteochondral Lesions of the Tibial Plafond and Ankle Instability With Ankle Cartilage Lesions: Proceedings of the International Consensus Meeting on Cartilage Repair of the Ankle.

Foot & ankle international·2022
Same author

Current trends in the anterior cruciate ligament part 1: biology and biomechanics.

Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA·2021
Same journal

Common Difficulties and Complications of Circular External Fixation in the Foot and Ankle.

Foot and ankle clinics·2026
Same journal

External Fixation for the Management of Clubfoot Sequelae in Children and Adolescents.

Foot and ankle clinics·2026
Same journal

Ankle Distraction Arthroplasty: Evidence and Current Indications.

Foot and ankle clinics·2026
Same journal

Distal Third Tibial Nonunions: Understanding Its Causes and Ring Fixator Treatment Strategies.

Foot and ankle clinics·2026
Same journal

Minimally Invasive Treatment of Tibial Plafond Fractures Using Circular External Fixators.

Foot and ankle clinics·2026
Same journal

Management of Severe Cavovarus and Equinocavovarus Deformities Using Hexapod External Fixation.

Foot and ankle clinics·2026
See all related articles

This article reviews seven clinical systems, detailing their pros and cons regarding application, accuracy, and availability. The goal is to improve understanding and encourage wider clinical use of these valuable tools.

Area of Science:

  • Clinical assessment methodologies
  • Healthcare system evaluation

Background:

  • Multiple clinical assessment systems exist, each with unique characteristics.
  • Understanding these systems is crucial for effective clinical practice.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To systematically describe seven clinical systems.
  • To elucidate the advantages and disadvantages of each system.
  • To promote broader adoption of these systems in clinical settings.

Main Methods:

  • Comparative analysis of seven distinct clinical systems.
  • Evaluation based on application ease, accuracy, validity, and availability.

Main Results:

  • Each system presents a unique profile of benefits and limitations.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Key differentiating factors include practical applicability and reliability.

    • Conclusions:

    • Increased awareness and understanding of these systems can enhance their clinical utility.
    • Facilitating easier application will drive greater integration into routine healthcare.