Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 20, 2026

Point-of-Care Ultrasound: A Review of Ultrasound Parameters for Predicting Difficult Airways
Published on: April 7, 2023
CT assessment of vocal cord medialization
V A Kumar1, J S Lewin, L E Ginsberg
1Division of Diagnostic Imaging, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA. vakumarmd@yahoo.com
Background And Purpose:
Unilateral vocal cord paralysis (UVCP) occurs after iatrogenic injury or disease process and is associated with dysphonia and aspiration. Various surgical options are available for treatment of UVCP, including vocal cord medialization thyroplasty and injection laryngoplasty. These augmentative procedures improve phonation and airway protection. Our purpose was to demonstrate the CT appearance of implants used for the treatment of UVCP.
Methods:
Twelve patients treated surgically for UVCP were studied with helical CT. The vocal cords were augmented by using Silastic implants (n = 7), polytetrafluoroethylene (Gore-Tex) implants (n = 2), Teflon injections (n = 2), or fat injection (n = 1). Augmented vocal cords were characterized by size, shape, and Hounsfield units (HU). Two other patients with failed medialization thyroplasty were evaluated for the position of the extruded implant relative to the paralyzed vocal cord.
Results:
The 7 Silastic implants were triangular and hyperattenuated (293.4 +/- 90.4 HU). The 2 Gore-Tex implants were heterogeneous with lobulated medial margins and were hyperattenuating (320 and 414 HU). The injected materials demonstrated ovoid/masslike configurations: the 2 Teflon injections were hyperattenuated (107 and 429 HU), and the fat injection was hypoattenuated (-102 HU). Inferior displacement of the implant was demonstrated relative to the true vocal cord in 2 patients with failed Silastic thyroplasties.
Conclusion:
CT can distinguish various types of vocal cord augmentation. Silastic implants are recognized by their characteristic triangular configuration. The Gore-Tex implants had unique heterogeneous attenuation with lobulated medial margins. Fat and Teflon injections both appear ovoid/masslike. Teflon injection should not be mistaken for tumor.
Related Concept Videos
Mitral Valve Prolapse II: Assessment and Management
Mitral Stenosis II: Clinical features and Diagnostic Tests
Mitral Valve Prolapse I: Introduction
Assessment of the Cardiovascular System IV: Auscultation
Normal Heart Sounds
S1 (First Heart Sound)-
S1 is made by the closure of the mitral and tricuspid valves (atrioventricular valves), marking the beginning of systole.
S2 (Second Heart Sound)-
S2 is made by the closure of the aortic and pulmonic valves (semilunar valves), marking the end of the systole.
Assessment of Airway, Skin Color, and Use of Accessory Muscles
Introduction
The initial evaluation of a patient's respiratory system...
Mitral Regurgitation II: Clinical Features and Diagnostic Tests
