Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

A brief review on software developments for group sequential and adaptive designs.

Gernot Wassmer1, Marc Vandemeulebroecke

  • 1Institute for Medical Statistics, Informatics, and Epidemiology, University of Cologne, Joseph-Stelzmann-Str. 9, 50931 Cologne, Germany. gernot.wassmer@uni-koeln.de

Biometrical Journal. Biometrische Zeitschrift
|September 16, 2006
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

A Note on "A Comparison of Two Methods for Adaptive Multi-Arm Two-Stage Design".

Statistics in medicine·2026
Same author

In Silico Clinical Trials in Drug Development: A Systematic Review.

Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science·2025
Same author

Clinical trials with interim analyses: standardizing terminology to increase clarity.

Trials·2025
Same author

WATCH: A Workflow to Assess Treatment Effect Heterogeneity in Drug Development for Clinical Trial Sponsors.

Pharmaceutical statistics·2024
Same author

Two-stage group-sequential designs with delayed responses - what is the point of applying corresponding methods?

BMC medical research methodology·2024
Same author

New insights on hidradenitis suppurativa phenotypes and treatment response: An exploratory automated analysis of the SUNSHINE and SUNRISE trials.

Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology : JEADV·2024
Same journal

Comparison of Different Methods for the Meta-Analysis of Diagnostic Test Accuracy Studies-A Simulation Study.

Biometrical journal. Biometrische Zeitschrift·2026
Same journal

When to Adjust for Multiple Testing: A Unifying Guiding Principle.

Biometrical journal. Biometrische Zeitschrift·2026
Same journal

Ensuring Quality in Preclinical Research: The Importance of Being Human.

Biometrical journal. Biometrische Zeitschrift·2026
Same journal

Addressing Cluster-Level Treatment Effect Heterogeneity in Sample Size Determination for Hierarchical 2 × 2 Factorial Designs.

Biometrical journal. Biometrische Zeitschrift·2026
Same journal

A Multiple Imputation Approach to Distinguish Curative From Life-Prolonging Effects in the Presence of Missing Covariates.

Biometrical journal. Biometrische Zeitschrift·2026
Same journal

Tests for Categorical Data Beyond Pearson: A Distance Covariance and Energy Distance Approach.

Biometrical journal. Biometrische Zeitschrift·2026
See all related articles

This paper reviews software for group sequential and adaptive designs. New adaptive design software allows data-dependent adaptations while controlling Type I error rates.

Area of Science:

  • Biostatistics
  • Clinical Trial Design
  • Statistical Software

Background:

  • Group sequential and adaptive designs are crucial for efficient clinical trials.
  • Existing software solutions vary from stand-alone packages to integrated modules.
  • Advancements in adaptive designs necessitate specialized software tools.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To provide a comprehensive review of available software for group sequential and adaptive designs.
  • To highlight new developments in software for adaptive clinical trial designs.
  • To inform researchers about tools for data-dependent design modifications.

Main Methods:

  • Literature review of existing and emerging software.
  • Categorization of software by type (stand-alone, modules).

Related Experiment Videos

  • Focus on software capabilities for adaptive design implementation.
  • Main Results:

    • A range of software options exist for group sequential and adaptive designs.
    • New software facilitates adaptive design execution.
    • Current software supports Type I error rate control during adaptations.

    Conclusions:

    • Software availability for advanced clinical trial designs is growing.
    • New developments enhance the flexibility of adaptive trial designs.
    • Researchers can leverage these tools for robust trial management.