Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Errors in estimates of peritoneal fluid volume.

F H Daniels1, N D Nedev, L C Lowe

  • 1Department of Biomedical Engineering, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina 27706.

Artificial Organs
|August 1, 1990
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Bilateral renal vein thrombosis can cause nephrotic range proteinuria.

QJM : monthly journal of the Association of Physicians·2012
Same author

A method for the estimation of hydration state during hemodialysis using a calf bioimpedance technique.

Physiological measurement·2008
Same author

Segment-specific resistivity improves body fluid volume estimates from bioimpedance spectroscopy in hemodialysis patients.

Journal of applied physiology (Bethesda, Md. : 1985)·2005
Same author

Adjustment of dry weight in hemodialysis patients using intradialytic continuous multifrequency bioimpedance of the calf.

The International journal of artificial organs·2004
Same author

Modeling of early events in T cell signal transduction after controlled T cell activation by peptide major histocompatibility complex.

Annals of biomedical engineering·2001
Same author

Controlling duration of contact between T cells and antigen-presenting cells.

Journal of immunological methods·2001

Indicator dilution techniques for measuring intraperitoneal fluid volume in rats showed significant errors. These findings challenge common assumptions used in peritoneal dialysis analysis, highlighting the need for more accurate volume assessment methods.

Area of Science:

  • Physiology
  • Biochemistry
  • Medical Engineering

Background:

  • Drainage volumes have limitations for monitoring intraperitoneal fluid.
  • Indicator dilution techniques are frequently used but their accuracy is often unconfirmed.
  • Adequacy of volume marker estimates in peritoneal fluid has received limited attention.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare volume estimates derived from indicator dilution with direct fluid collections.
  • To identify and quantify errors in indicator dilution techniques for intraperitoneal fluid volume.
  • To assess the validity of assumptions used in peritoneal dialysis volume transport analysis.

Main Methods:

  • Experimental exchanges were conducted in rats.
  • Blue dextran and hemoglobin were used as dilution markers.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Direct collections of surgically exposed intraperitoneal fluid were performed for comparison.

    • Main Results:

    • Significant systematic and random errors were observed in indicator dilution volume estimates.
    • Systematic errors were attributed to fixed marker removal from peritoneal fluid.
    • Random errors resulted from variable appearance of endogenous chromogens.

    Conclusions:

    • Indicator dilution techniques provide inadequate estimates of intraperitoneal fluid volume.
    • Observed marker behavior contradicts assumptions in peritoneal dialysis transport analysis.
    • Further research is needed to develop reliable methods for intraperitoneal fluid volume monitoring.