Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Detecting recombination in evolving nucleotide sequences.

Cheong Xin Chan1, Robert G Beiko, Mark A Ragan

  • 1ARC Centre in Bioinformatics and Institute for Molecular Bioscience, the University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD 4072, Australia. c.chan@imb.uq.edu.au

BMC Bioinformatics
|September 19, 2006
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Automated eDNA and eRNA profiling for biodiversity monitoring in marine and freshwater ecosystems.

Scientific reports·2026
Same author

Heatwave winners and losers: cryptic coral holobionts differ in thermal tolerance.

Proceedings. Biological sciences·2026
Same author

Contrasting population structures of reef-building corals and their algal symbionts inform adaptive potential across the western Pacific.

Current biology : CB·2026
Same author

Effect of bedrest on the human gut and oral microbiome: implications for frailty.

Experimental gerontology·2026
Same author

How a coral holobiont stays in sync in nature.

Cell host & microbe·2026
Same author

Comparison of Spatio-Temporal Dynamics and Composition in Size-Fractionated and Unfractionated Northwestern Atlantic Microbial Communities.

Environmental microbiology reports·2026
Same journal

OpenIMC: an open-source platform for analyzing single-cell and spatial proteomics by imaging mass cytometry.

BMC bioinformatics·2026
Same journal

NAP: an open source pipeline for cross-domain microbiome profiling using Nanopore sequencing-derived amplicon data.

BMC bioinformatics·2026
Same journal

SurvGME: an R package for survival analysis with graphical and measurement error models.

BMC bioinformatics·2026
Same journal

SimMapNet: a Bayesian framework for gene regulatory network inference using gene ontology similarities as external hint.

BMC bioinformatics·2026
Same journal

Dual channel drug-drug interactions extraction based on cross attention.

BMC bioinformatics·2026
Same journal

FeSseqdb: a curated sequence-level database and interpretable machine learning framework for identifying iron-sulfur proteins.

BMC bioinformatics·2026
See all related articles

Subsequent substitutions obscure genetic recombination detection. Bayesian phylogenetic methods accurately identify recombination events and breakpoints, outperforming other approaches, especially for complex datasets.

Area of Science:

  • Molecular Biology
  • Bioinformatics
  • Evolutionary Biology

Background:

  • Genetic recombination creates diverse phylogenetic histories in homologous genes.
  • Subsequent residue substitutions can mask recombination events, complicating detection.
  • Limited understanding exists regarding the impact of substitutions on recombination detection algorithms.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the influence of post-recombination substitutions on the accuracy of recombination detection methods.
  • To compare the performance of different algorithms in identifying recombination events and breakpoints.

Main Methods:

  • Simulated datasets of four nucleotide sequences under a homogeneous evolutionary model were used.
  • The study assessed the effects of substitution rates, prior sequence history, and recombination type (reciprocal vs. non-reciprocal).

Related Experiment Videos

  • Various recombination detection programs were tested and compared.

    • Main Results:

    • The accuracy of recombination detection was influenced by the amount of subsequent substitutions, sequence evolutionary history, and recombination type.
    • Bayesian phylogenetic-based approaches demonstrated high accuracy in detecting recombination evidence and breakpoints.
    • These Bayesian methods showed greater robustness to parameter settings compared to other tested approaches.

    Conclusions:

    • Post-recombination substitutions generally reduce the accuracy of recombination detection programs.
    • The most effective method for detecting recombined regions may not be the best for pinpointing breakpoints.
    • Combining multiple detection approaches can enhance efficiency and predictive accuracy for challenging datasets.