Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 9, 2026

Fluorescence Recovery after Merging a Droplet to Measure the Two-dimensional Diffusion of a Phospholipid Monolayer
Published on: October 15, 2015
Relative velocities of DNAPL and aqueous phase plume migration
R Putzlocher1, B H Kueper, D A Reynolds
1Department of Civil Engineering, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada K7L 3N6.
This study uses computer models to explore how dense nonaqueous phase liquids (DNAPLs) and groundwater plumes move in sandy aquifers. The researchers found that DNAPLs can spread laterally even when there is no clear sign of a groundwater plume nearby. The most important factors influencing their movement are the viscosity of the DNAPL and how strongly it binds to soil. The slope of the underlying aquitard had little effect on the results. The study shows that DNAPL can exist in areas where traditional monitoring methods might miss it. The presence of certain chemicals in groundwater may suggest DNAPL is nearby. The findings help improve how we understand and model DNAPL movement in the environment. This could lead to better strategies for monitoring and cleaning up contaminated sites.
Area of Science:
- Groundwater hydrology
- Contaminant transport modeling
- Environmental engineering
Background:
Understanding the movement of dense nonaqueous phase liquids (DNAPLs) in aquifers is challenging due to their complex interactions with geological and chemical factors. Prior research has shown that DNAPLs tend to migrate along the base of aquifers, influenced by hydraulic gradients and subsurface structures. However, the relationship between DNAPL movement and the development of aqueous phase plumes remains unclear in certain scenarios. This gap motivated researchers to explore how DNAPL and aqueous plumes behave relative to each other in sandy aquifers. The study addresses the uncertainty of whether DNAPL migration can occur independently of a detectable aqueous plume. Previous models often assumed a direct link between DNAPL and aqueous phase movement, but this may not always hold true. The absence of a shallow aqueous plume does not necessarily indicate the absence of DNAPL deeper in the subsurface. This study aims to clarify the conditions under which DNAPL can move without a corresponding aqueous plume. The implications for environmental monitoring and remediation strategies are significant, as traditional methods may miss DNAPL occurrences. This research contributes to a more accurate conceptual model of DNAPL transport in heterogeneous environments.
Purpose Of The Study:
The goal of this study is to assess the relative velocities of DNAPL and aqueous phase plumes in sandy aquifers. The researchers sought to determine how DNAPL properties and aquifer characteristics influence their migration. A key question is whether DNAPL can move independently of an aqueous plume. The study focuses on scenarios where DNAPL spreads laterally at the base of an aquifer. The presence of a sloping aquitard beneath the aquifer introduces additional complexity. The study also examines the role of hydraulic gradients in shaping plume behavior. By modeling these interactions, the researchers aim to improve conceptual models for DNAPL transport. The findings may inform the design of more effective monitoring and remediation strategies. The study highlights the importance of considering DNAPL movement beyond shallow monitoring wells. The results could help explain cases where DNAPL is present but not detected by traditional methods.
Main Methods:
The researchers used numerical simulation to model DNAPL and aqueous plume migration in sandy aquifers. The simulations incorporated a sloping aquitard beneath the aquifer to mimic real-world conditions. The study considered the effects of DNAPL viscosity and soil-water partition coefficient (Kd) on plume behavior. A sensitivity analysis was conducted to evaluate the impact of varying chemical and geological parameters. The simulations tracked the lateral movement of DNAPL and the development of the aqueous plume. The model accounted for the hydraulic gradient driving the aqueous phase migration. The researchers varied the dip of the underlying aquitard to assess its influence. The study compared the relative velocities of DNAPL and the aqueous phase plume. The simulations provided insights into the conditions under which DNAPL can move independently. The results help clarify the relationship between DNAPL and aqueous plumes in heterogeneous environments.
Main Results:
The study found that DNAPL viscosity and the soil-water partition coefficient (Kd) are the most influential factors in determining relative plume velocities. The dip of the underlying aquitard had minimal impact on the results within the tested range. DNAPL can migrate laterally even in the absence of a well-developed aqueous plume. In some cases, DNAPL movement occurs beyond the reach of shallow monitoring wells. The presence of a highly sorbing compound in groundwater may indicate upgradient DNAPL. The study shows that DNAPL and aqueous plumes do not always move in tandem. The absence of a shallow aqueous plume does not rule out DNAPL migration. The findings suggest that DNAPL can exist in areas where traditional monitoring fails to detect it. The results highlight the importance of considering DNAPL movement in conceptual models. The study provides a framework for understanding DNAPL transport in complex subsurface settings.
Conclusions:
The authors conclude that DNAPL and aqueous plumes may not always migrate at the same rate or in the same direction. The study shows that DNAPL can move independently of a detectable aqueous plume. This finding has implications for the design of monitoring and remediation strategies. The absence of a shallow aqueous plume does not guarantee the absence of DNAPL. The presence of a highly sorbing compound in groundwater may suggest upgradient DNAPL. The study emphasizes the need to consider DNAPL movement beyond shallow monitoring wells. The results support the development of more accurate conceptual models for DNAPL transport. The authors suggest that traditional methods may miss DNAPL occurrences in certain scenarios. The findings provide a basis for improving environmental monitoring and remediation approaches. The study contributes to a better understanding of DNAPL behavior in heterogeneous aquifers.
Frequently Asked Questions
DNAPL viscosity and the soil-water partition coefficient (Kd) are the most important factors.
Yes, the study shows DNAPL can move independently of a well-developed aqueous plume.
The study found the aquitard dip had minimal impact within the tested range of values.
It may indicate the immediate upgradient presence of residual or pooled DNAPL.
They suggest DNAPL may exist beyond the reach of shallow monitoring wells.
DNAPL and aqueous plumes may not always move in tandem, affecting model accuracy.
Related Concept Videos
Relative Velocity in Two Dimensions
Analyte Adsorption and Distribution
Column Efficiency: Rate Theory
During elution, a solute molecule experiences numerous transitions between stationary and mobile phases, exhibiting irregular residence times in...
Theories of Dissolution: Diffusion Layer Model
This process starts with a thin layer, saturated with the drug, forming at the interface between the solid and liquid. The solute then diffuses from this layer into the main solution. The Noyes-Whitney equation suggests that the rate of dissolution relies on the diffusion...
Steady, Laminar Flow Between Parallel Plates
Pipe Flowrate Measurement: Problem Solving

