Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 20, 2026

A Fluorescence-based Method to Study Bacterial Gene Regulation in Infected Tissues
Published on: February 19, 2019
Species-specific differences in the activity of PrfA, the key regulator of listerial virulence genes
Norman Mauder1, Regina Ecke, Sonja Mertins
1Lehrstuhl für Mikrobiologie, Biozentrum, Universität Würzburg, Am Hubland, D-97074 Würzburg, Germany.
Abstract:
PrfA, the master regulator of LIPI-1, is indispensable for the pathogenesis of the human pathogen Listeria monocytogenes and the animal pathogen Listeria ivanovii. PrfA is also present in the apathogenic species Listeria seeligeri, and in this study, we elucidate the differences between PrfA proteins from the pathogenic and apathogenic species of the genus Listeria. PrfA proteins of L. monocytogenes (PrfA(Lm) and PrfA*(Lm)), L. ivanovii (PrfA(Li)), and L. seeligeri (PrfA(Ls)) were purified, and their equilibrium constants for binding to the PrfA box of the hly promoter (Phly(Lm)) were determined by surface plasmon resonance. In addition, the capacities of these PrfA proteins to bind to the PrfA-dependent promoters Phly and PactA and to form ternary complexes together with RNA polymerase were analyzed in electrophoretic mobility shift assays, and their abilities to initiate transcription in vitro starting at these promoters were compared. The results show that PrfA(Li) resembled the constitutively active mutant PrfA*(Lm) more than the wild-type PrfA(Lm), whereas PrfA(Ls) showed a drastically reduced capacity to bind to the PrfA-dependent promoters Phly and PactA. In contrast, the efficiencies of PrfA(Lm), PrfA*(Lm), and PrfA(Li) forming ternary complexes and initiating transcription at Phly and PactA were rather similar, while those of PrfA(Ls) were also much lower. The low binding and transcriptional activation capacities of PrfA(Ls) seem to be in part due to amino acid exchanges in its C-terminal domain (compared to PrfA(Lm) and PrfA(Li)). In contrast to the significant differences in the biochemical properties of PrfA(Lm), PrfA(Li), and PrfA(Ls), the PrfA-dependent promoters of hly (Phly(Lm), Phly(L)(i), and Phly(L)(s)) and actA (PactA(Lm), PactA(L)(i), and PactA(L)(s)) of the three Listeria species did not significantly differ in their binding affinities to the various PrfA proteins and in their strengths to promote transcription in vitro. The allelic replacement of prfA(Lm) with prfA(Ls) in L. monocytogenes leads to low expression of PrfA-dependent genes and to reduced in vivo virulence of L. monocytogenes, suggesting that the altered properties of PrfA(Ls) protein are a major cause for the low virulence of L. seeligeri.
More Related Videos
10:18A Fast and Reliable Pipeline for Bacterial Transcriptome Analysis Case study: Serine-dependent Gene Regulation in Streptococcus pneumoniae
Published on: April 25, 2015
14:05Imaging InlC Secretion to Investigate Cellular Infection by the Bacterial Pathogen Listeria monocytogenes
Published on: September 19, 2013
Related Concept Videos
Regulation of Bacterial Virulence
Gene Regulation in Microbial Communities: Quorum Sensing
Prokaryotic Transcriptional Activators and Repressors
Transcription of prokaryotic...
Prokaryotic Transcriptional Activators and Repressors
Transcription of prokaryotic...
Stringent Response in E. coli
Bacterial RNA Polymerase
In most genes, the transcription site is a single base present upstream of the coding sequence. Though RNAP is a catalytically efficient enzyme, it does not recognize...