Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Localization: conventional and CT simulation.

G R Baker1

  • 1Kent Oncology Centre, Maidstone Hospital, Maidstone, Kent ME16 9QQ, UK.

The British Journal of Radiology
|September 19, 2006
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Identification and Adjudication of Adverse Events Following Rectal Cancer Surgery: Observational Case Series in a Region of Ontario, Canada.

Annals of surgical oncology·2021
Same author

Mandatory reporting legislation in Canada: improving systems for patient safety?

Health economics, policy, and law·2021
Same author

Quality improvement capacity: a survey of hospital quality managers.

Quality & safety in health care·2010
Same author

Measures of patient safety in developing and emerging countries: a review of the literature.

Quality & safety in health care·2010
Same author

Strengthening the contribution of quality improvement research to evidence based health care.

Quality & safety in health care·2006
Same author

Persistence of unsafe practice in everyday work: an exploration of organizational and psychological factors constraining safety in the operating room.

Quality & safety in health care·2006
Same journal

Machine learning models using 18F-FDG PET/CT radiomics for RAS mutation prediction and prognostic stratification in colorectal cancer.

The British journal of radiology·2026
Same journal

Predictors of Relapse in Oligometastatic Prostate Patients Receiving Stereotactic Ablative Radiotherapy.

The British journal of radiology·2026
Same journal

An Evaluation of Radiotherapy and Response in the Management of Perivascular Epithelioid Cell Tumors.

The British journal of radiology·2026
Same journal

Ensuring radiology reporting quality across a national lung cancer screening programme.

The British journal of radiology·2026
Same journal

Utility of High-Resolution Semiconductor Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography in the Assessment of Breast Cancer Extent: Comparison with Magnetic Resonance Imaging.

The British journal of radiology·2026
Same journal

Airway Imaging Practices in Primary Ciliary Dyskinesia: A Global Survey to Guide Standardized Guidelines.

The British journal of radiology·2026
See all related articles

Advancements in 3D imaging and computing enhance radiation therapy planning. Cone beam imaging and CT scans improve target localization, but challenges with moving structures require advanced techniques like 4D data sets for accuracy.

Area of Science:

  • Medical Physics
  • Radiation Oncology
  • Medical Imaging

Background:

  • Radiation therapy planning has evolved significantly with technological advancements.
  • Conventional simulation methods provided limited 2D data, hindering complex treatment strategies.
  • Computed axial tomography (CT) and other cross-sectional imaging modalities revolutionized diagnostic capabilities.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To review the evolution and impact of imaging technologies on radiation therapy simulation and treatment planning.
  • To discuss the transition from conventional to virtual simulation and the integration of advanced imaging.
  • To highlight challenges in localizing moving targets and potential solutions for improved accuracy.

Main Methods:

  • Review of imaging developments including cone beam imaging, CT, MRI, and PET.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Discussion of virtual simulation software and image fusion techniques.
  • Analysis of motion management strategies such as 4D data sets and image-guided radiotherapy.

    • Main Results:

    • Cone beam imaging transformed simulators into 3D devices, enabling complex treatment planning.
    • CT modifications and simulation software enhanced radiotherapy applications.
    • Image fusion with MRI and PET aids tumor delineation.
    • Motion management techniques (4D data, breath-holding, gating) address challenges with moving structures.

    Conclusions:

    • Modern imaging and computing power significantly improve radiation therapy target localization and treatment planning.
    • Virtual simulation and advanced imaging modalities enhance accuracy but require robust quality control.
    • Addressing patient and organ motion is critical for precise radiotherapy delivery and minimizing dose to healthy tissues.