Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 20, 2026
Midface Hypoplasia and Cranial Base Morphology in Syndromic Craniosynostosis: A Comparative Analysis Study Using a Predictive Regression Model
Published on: November 4, 2025
Long-term stability and growth following unilateral mandibular distraction in growing children with craniofacial
Pradip R Shetye1, Barry H Grayson, Richard J Mackool
1New York, N.Y. From the Institute of Reconstructive Plastic Surgery, New York University Medical Center.
Background:
The purpose of this study was to evaluate long-term mandibular skeletal stability and growth following unilateral mandibular distraction in growing children.
Methods:
This retrospective longitudinal study of 12 consecutive patients with unilateral craniofacial microsomia who underwent mandibular distraction had a range of 5 years of postdistraction follow-up; five patients were followed for 10 years. Records included clinical photographs, dental study models, lateral and posteroanterior cephalograms, and panoramic radiographs obtained before distraction, at the time of device removal, and 1, 5, and 10 years after distraction. The mean patient age at the time of distraction was 48 months. The device was activated an average of 21.7 mm at the rate of 1 mm per day. The mean latency period was 6.1 days, and the mean consolidation period was 60.6 days. Fifty-two parameters were examined at each of the five time intervals.
Results:
On average, the ramal length (condylion to gonion) increased 13.04 mm in the distracted rami. At 1 year after distraction, this dimension decreased by 3.46 mm. At 5 and 10 years after distraction, the average condylion-gonion dimension increased by 3.83 and 4 mm, respectively, with an average growth rate of 0.87 mm per year; during the same period, the unaffected ramus grew 1.15 mm per year.
Conclusions:
The distraction technique does not eliminate the inherent growth potential of the affected mandibular side. Facial asymmetry is significantly improved after distraction, and despite mild relapse observed during the first year, surgical correction is stable in the later years of follow-up.
