Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Dysrhythmias IV: Characteristics of Bradyarrhythmias

Dysrhythmias IV: Characteristics of Bradyarrhythmias

Bradyarrhythmias are cardiac rhythm disorders characterized by a slower-than-normal heart rate, typically defined as fewer than 60 beats per minute. Some of which are discussed here:Sinus BradycardiaSinus bradycardia presents a heart rate lower than 60 beats per minute, with a regular rhythm originating from the SA node. The ECG typically shows normal P waves preceding each QRS complex, a normal PR interval (0.12 to 0.20 seconds), and a normal QRS duration (0.06 to 0.10 seconds).First-Degree AV...

Disturbances in Heart Rhythm

Disturbances in Heart Rhythm

Arrhythmia or dysrhythmia refers to an abnormal heart rhythm caused by a defect in the heart's conduction system. It can cause the heart to beat irregularly, too quickly, or too slowly, leading to symptoms like chest pain, shortness of breath, and fainting. Factors such as stress, caffeine, alcohol, nicotine, cocaine, certain drugs, congenital defects, diseases, and electrolyte abnormalities can trigger arrhythmias.
Arrhythmias are categorized by their speed, rhythm, and origin. A slow heart...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Limited association between septal myocardial involvement on PET imaging and conduction disturbance in cardiac sarcoidosis.

Heart rhythm O2·2026

Same author

Distinct Purkinje electrogram phenotypes at ventricular fibrillation trigger sites in idiopathic and structural heart disease.

Heart rhythm·2026

Same author

Pacemaker implant and programming challenges in a young patient with painful left bundle branch block syndrome.

HeartRhythm case reports·2026

Same author

Trigger- vs Substrate-Based Purkinje De-Networking for Ventricular Fibrillation: Insights From a Multicenter Study.

JACC. Clinical electrophysiology·2026

Same author

Adjunctive Purkinje Denetworking During Ventricular Tachycardia Ablation in Patients With Prior Ventricular Fibrillation.

JACC. Clinical electrophysiology·2026

Same author

Impact of age and diagnosis-to-ablation time on sex differences in 12-month outcomes after catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation: An admIRE subanalysis.

Heart rhythm·2026

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jul 20, 2026

Optimization of Transesophageal Atrial Pacing to Assess Atrial Fibrillation Susceptibility in Mice

Optimization of Transesophageal Atrial Pacing to Assess Atrial Fibrillation Susceptibility in Mice

Published on: June 29, 2022

Underestimation of pacing threshold as determined by an automatic ventricular threshold testing algorithm.

William H Sauer¹, Joshua M Cooper, Rebecca W Lai

¹Division of Cardiology, University of Colorado at Denver and Health Sciences Center, Denver, Colorado, USA. william.sauer@uphs.upenn.edu

Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology : PACE

|September 20, 2006

Summary

Manual and automatic pacing threshold tests yielded different results due to varying AV intervals. Altered diastolic filling periods in the right ventricle impacted pacing thresholds with a new lead.

More Related Videos

Programmed Electrical Stimulation in Mice

Programmed Electrical Stimulation in Mice

Published on: May 26, 2010

Electrophysiological Assessment of Murine Atria with High-Resolution Optical Mapping

Electrophysiological Assessment of Murine Atria with High-Resolution Optical Mapping

Published on: February 22, 2018

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jul 20, 2026

Optimization of Transesophageal Atrial Pacing to Assess Atrial Fibrillation Susceptibility in Mice

Optimization of Transesophageal Atrial Pacing to Assess Atrial Fibrillation Susceptibility in Mice

Published on: June 29, 2022

Programmed Electrical Stimulation in Mice

Programmed Electrical Stimulation in Mice

Published on: May 26, 2010

Electrophysiological Assessment of Murine Atria with High-Resolution Optical Mapping

Electrophysiological Assessment of Murine Atria with High-Resolution Optical Mapping

Published on: February 22, 2018

Area of Science:

Cardiology
Biomedical Engineering
Electrophysiology

Background:

Pacing threshold determination is crucial for optimal pacemaker function.
Automatic algorithms like Ventricular Capture Management (VCM) aim to simplify threshold testing.
Manual threshold testing is a traditional method requiring careful parameter adjustment.

Observation:

A significant discrepancy was observed between manual threshold testing and VCM algorithm results.
The difference in pacing thresholds was linked to the specific AV intervals employed during each test.
The patient had a new passive fixation lead implanted in the right ventricular apex.

Findings:

The study identified that varying AV intervals between manual and automatic testing methods caused differing pacing threshold values.
Altered right ventricular dimensions, influenced by changes in diastolic filling periods, were proposed as a contributing factor to the threshold variability.
This suggests that lead characteristics and patient-specific cardiac dynamics can influence automatic threshold measurements.

Implications:

Clinicians should be aware of potential discrepancies in pacing thresholds derived from different testing modalities.
Further research is needed to understand how AV interval settings and patient hemodynamics affect automatic capture management algorithms.
Optimizing threshold testing protocols may improve the safety and efficacy of cardiac pacing therapy.