Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Laparoscopic prostatectomy: where do we stand?

Mesut Remzi, Bob Djavan

    Reviews in Urology
    |September 21, 2006
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy offers an effective treatment for localized prostate cancer. While initially longer and more costly than open surgery, it becomes cost-effective and nearly as fast with surgeon experience, potentially challenging traditional methods.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    Impact of Personnel Scarcity on Urolithiasis Treatment: A Comparative Study of the Pre- and Post-Pandemic Eras.

    Urologia internationalis·2025
    Same author

    A retrospective cross-sectional study on district-based socioeconomic status and prostate cancer diagnosis.

    Wiener klinische Wochenschrift·2024
    Same author

    Oncological Outcomes of Active Surveillance versus Surgery or Ablation for Patients with Small Renal Masses: A Systematic Review and Quantitative Analysis.

    European urology oncology·2024
    Same author

    The efficacy of adjuvant mitotane therapy and radiotherapy following adrenalectomy in patients with adrenocortical carcinoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

    Urologic oncology·2024
    Same author

    Treatment of adrenocortical carcinoma: oncological and endocrine outcomes.

    Current opinion in urology·2022
    Same author

    Robot-Assisted Partial Nephrectomy Mid-Term Oncologic Outcomes: A Systematic Review.

    Journal of clinical medicine·2022
    Same journal

    Erratum: Author's Name Correction for "From Radical to Partial Nephrectomy in the Setting of Solitary Functioning Kidney: Neoadjuvant Treatment of Renal Cell Carcinoma".

    Reviews in urology·2021
    Same journal

    Update in Female Hormonal Therapy: What the Urologist Should Know: NYU Case of the Month, December 2020.

    Reviews in urology·2021
    Same journal

    Genetic Mutations Associated With Prostate Cancer and Normal Serum PSA and DRE-Implications for Prostate Cancer Screening and Management: NYU Case of the Month, November 2020.

    Reviews in urology·2021
    Same journal

    Surgical Management of the "Large" Prostate: The Robotic Simple Prostatectomy: NYU Case of the Month, October 2020.

    Reviews in urology·2021
    Same journal

    Cryptozoospermia Associated With Genital Tucking Behavior in a Transwoman.

    Reviews in urology·2021
    Same journal

    Washington Roundup.

    Reviews in urology·2021
    See all related articles

    Area of Science:

    • Urology
    • Surgical Oncology
    • Minimally Invasive Surgery

    Background:

    • Localized prostate cancer necessitates surgical intervention.
    • Radical prostatectomy, both open and laparoscopic, is a primary treatment modality.
    • Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy presents unique cost and technical considerations.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To evaluate the efficacy and evolving cost-effectiveness of laparoscopic radical prostatectomy.
    • To compare the operative time and associated costs of laparoscopic versus open prostatectomy.
    • To assess the potential of laparoscopic radical prostatectomy to become a standard approach.

    Main Methods:

    • Comparative analysis of surgical outcomes and costs.
    • Review of learning curve effects on operative time and resource utilization.

    Related Experiment Videos

  • Longitudinal assessment of cost-efficiency with increasing surgical experience.

    • Main Results:

    • Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy is effective for localized prostate cancer.
    • Initially, laparoscopic procedures are more time-consuming and costly than open surgery.
    • With accumulating surgeon experience, laparoscopic radical prostatectomy demonstrates reduced costs and comparable operative times.

    Conclusions:

    • Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy is a viable and increasingly cost-effective treatment for localized prostate cancer.
    • The technical demands of the procedure are overcome with experience, leading to improved efficiency.
    • As urological expertise grows, the laparoscopic approach is poised to compete with established open surgical methods.