Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Modified central line for pneumothorax.

M Blair Marshall1

  • 1Division of Thoracic Surgery, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA. mbm5@gunet.georgetown.edu

The Annals of Thoracic Surgery
|September 26, 2006
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Repair of a Bronchoesophageal Fistula Using a Pericardial U-Flap.

Cureus·2025
Same author

Robotic-assisted single-port system for pulmonary lobectomy: A prospective feasibility study.

The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery·2025
Same author

Systematic Review of the Comparative Studies of Image-Guided Thermal Ablation, Stereotactic Radiosurgery, and Sublobar Resection for Treatment of High-Risk Patients with Stage I Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer.

Seminars in thoracic and cardiovascular surgery·2024
Same author

Systematic Review of Sublobar Resection for Treatment of High-Risk Patients with Stage I Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer.

Seminars in thoracic and cardiovascular surgery·2024
Same author

Systematic Review of Stereotactic Ablative Radiotherapy (SABR)/Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy (SBRT) for Treatment of High-Risk Patients with Stage I Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer.

Seminars in thoracic and cardiovascular surgery·2024
Same author

Treatment of High-Risk Patients with Stage I Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer.

Seminars in thoracic and cardiovascular surgery·2024
Same journal

Context-Driven Management of Bilateral Diaphragmatic Failure After Phrenic Nerve Sacrifice.

The Annals of thoracic surgery·2026
Same journal

Uncomplicated type B aortic dissection: Are US-based societal guidelines delaying science?

The Annals of thoracic surgery·2026
Same journal

Methodological Paradigms and Clinical Realities in Defining High-Volume Centres for Valve-Sparing Aortic Root Replacement.

The Annals of thoracic surgery·2026
Same journal

Long-Term Outcomes of Concomitant Atrial Fibrillation Management During CABG: Standardization or Compromise?

The Annals of thoracic surgery·2026
Same journal

Ongoing Dialogue and Support for the Future of Congenital Cardiac Surgery.

The Annals of thoracic surgery·2026
Same journal

A Bridge With Gaps.

The Annals of thoracic surgery·2026
See all related articles

Chest tube thoracostomy for pneumothorax is painful. A modified central line offers a safe, effective, and inexpensive alternative to traditional chest tubes and commercial pneumothorax catheters.

Area of Science:

  • Thoracic Surgery
  • Pulmonary Medicine
  • Medical Devices

Background:

  • Pneumothorax, spontaneous or iatrogenic, often necessitates pleural space drainage.
  • Current drainage methods include chest tubes and specialized pneumothorax catheters.
  • Chest tubes are associated with significant pain; catheters are costly and have variable success rates.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the efficacy, safety, and cost-effectiveness of a modified central line as an alternative for pneumothorax drainage.
  • To address the limitations of existing drainage techniques, namely pain and expense.

Main Methods:

  • Modification of a standard central venous catheter for use in pneumothorax management.
  • Clinical application of the modified central line in patients requiring pleural drainage.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Assessment of the technique's effectiveness, safety, reliability, and cost.

    • Main Results:

    • The modified central line technique proved effective in draining pneumothoraces.
    • The procedure was found to be safe, with no significant complications reported.
    • The modified approach demonstrated reliability and offered a significant cost saving compared to commercial kits.

    Conclusions:

    • A modified central line is a viable, safe, effective, and economical alternative for pneumothorax drainage.
    • This technique addresses the drawbacks of traditional chest tubes and commercial catheters.
    • Further adoption may improve patient comfort and reduce healthcare costs for pneumothorax management.