Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 19, 2026

Electrophysiological Measurements and Analysis of Nociception in Human Infants
Published on: December 20, 2011
Determining behavioural and physiological responses to pain in infants at risk for neurological impairment
Bonnie Stevens1, Patrick McGrath, Sharyn Gibbins
1Faculty of Nursing, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont., Canada. b.stevens@utoronto.ca
Insights
Infants at high risk for neurologic impairment (NI) show altered pain responses, with decreased facial actions and heart rate variability during heel lance. This highlights the need for tailored pain management in vulnerable neonates.
Area of Science:
- Neonatal care
- Pain assessment
- Neurology
Background:
- Infant pain assessment is validated, but data on infants at risk for neurologic impairment (NI) is limited.
- Understanding pain responses in neurologically at-risk infants is crucial for appropriate care.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare pain responses to heel lance in neonates with varying risks for NI.
- To investigate if infants at risk for NI exhibit different pain indicators compared to lower-risk infants.
Main Methods:
- Prospective observational cohort study involving 149 neonates (gestational age >25-40 weeks) across three risk groups for NI.
- Pain responses assessed via facial actions, heart rate (HR), oxygen saturation, and cry fundamental frequency during heel lance.
- Heart Rate Variability (HRV) analyzed for differences across risk cohorts and pain phases.
Main Results:
- A significant interaction between risk cohort and pain phase was observed for facial actions, with lower-risk infants showing more facial activity.
- All infants showed significant changes in HR and oxygen saturation during heel lance, with no cohort differences.
- Infants at moderate and high NI risk exhibited higher minimum and mean fundamental cry frequencies and greater decreases in HRV.
- Significant cohort by phase interactions were found for HRV, indicating altered autonomic responses in at-risk infants.
Conclusions:
- While all infants respond to painful stimuli, those at moderate to highest risk for NI demonstrate diminished pain responses in specific indicators.
- Findings suggest that infants at risk for NI may have altered pain processing, necessitating further investigation and potentially individualized pain management strategies.
Abstract:
Multiple researchers have validated indicators and measures of infant pain. However, infants at risk for neurologic impairment (NI) have been under studied. Therefore, whether their pain responses are similar to those of other infants is unknown. Pain responses to heel lance from 149 neonates (GA>25-40 weeks) from 3 Canadian Neonatal Intensive Care units at high (Cohort A, n=54), moderate (Cohort B, n=45) and low (Cohort C, n=50) risk for NI were compared in a prospective observational cohort study. A significant Cohort by Phase interaction for total facial action (F(6,409)=3.50, p=0.0022) and 4 individual facial actions existed; with Cohort C demonstrating the most facial action. A significant Phase effect existed for increased maximum Heart Rate (F(3,431)=58.1, p=0.001), minimum Heart Rate (F(3,431)=78.7, p=0.001), maximum Oxygen saturation (F(3,425)=47.6, p=0.001), and minimum oxygen saturation (F(3,425)=12.2, p=0.001) with no Cohort differences. Cohort B had significantly higher minimum (F(2,79)=3.71, p=0.029), and mean (F(2,79)=4.04, p=0.021) fundamental cry frequencies. A significant Phase effect for low/high frequency Heart Rate Variability (HRV) ratio (F(2,216)=4.97, p=0.008) was found with the greatest decrease in Cohort A. Significant Cohort by Phase interactions existed for low and high frequency HRV. All infants responded to the most painful phase of the heel lance; however, infants at moderate and highest risk for NI exhibited decreased responses in some indicators.

