Related Experiment Videos
Normalization and its relevance today.
1Division TEACCH, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill.
Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders
|September 1, 1990
Summary
The normalization principle, once effective for developmental disability services, now polarizes issues due to vague criteria and a focus away from individual client needs. New guiding concepts are needed for better community-based support.
Area of Science:
- Social Sciences
- Disability Studies
- Public Policy
Background:
- The normalization principle historically guided community-based services for individuals with developmental handicaps.
- Past successes focused on transitioning from institutions to individualized community care.
- Current challenges in developmental disability services are more complex than in the past.
Purpose of the Study:
- To critically evaluate the contemporary effectiveness of the normalization principle in developmental disability services.
- To identify the reasons for the polarization of issues surrounding the normalization principle.
- To propose the need for alternative guiding concepts for community-based support.
Main Methods:
- Qualitative analysis of the normalization principle's application in current practice.
- Review of theoretical versus practical outcomes.
- Examination of critiques and limitations of the normalization principle.
Main Results:
- The normalization principle's effectiveness has diminished, with theory often exceeding practice.
- Vague criteria and unattainable goals contribute to its limitations.
- The principle can detract from individual client needs, discourage diversity, and promote an undesirable value system.
Conclusions:
- The normalization principle, in its current application, has become problematic for developmental disability services.
- There is a need to move beyond the normalization principle towards new frameworks.
- Future approaches must be clearer, more client-centered, and aligned with beneficial value systems.