Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 19, 2026

Making MR Imaging Child's Play - Pediatric Neuroimaging Protocol, Guidelines and Procedure
Published on: July 30, 2009
Sedation and anesthesia protocols used for magnetic resonance imaging studies in infants: provider and pharmacologic
Priti G Dalal1, David Murray, Thomas Cox
1Department of Anesthesiology, St. Louis Children's Hospital, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri 63110, USA. pgdalal@hotmail.com
Insights
For infant MRI sedation, oral chloral hydrate showed fewer cardiorespiratory events than IV pentobarbital or propofol. However, propofol allowed for quicker scanning and discharge, while chloral hydrate had more movement during procedures.
Area of Science:
- Pediatric Anesthesiology
- Medical Imaging Sedation
Background:
- Sedation is crucial for pediatric magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).
- Current practices often use single drugs, but a tiered approach may optimize care.
- Infant sedation requires careful consideration of safety and efficacy.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the efficacy and safety of a tiered sedation approach in infants undergoing MRI.
- To compare cardiorespiratory events, scanning time, discharge time, and movement artifacts across different sedation regimens.
Main Methods:
- A prospective study of 258 infants requiring MRI.
- Comparison of three sedation groups: oral chloral hydrate (monitored by nurses), IV pentobarbital (bolus, monitored by nurses), and IV propofol (infusion, titrated by physicians).
Main Results:
- Chloral hydrate group had significantly fewer cardiorespiratory events (2.9%) compared to pentobarbital (13.4%) and propofol (13.6%).
- Propofol facilitated earlier MRI scanning start times (9.1 min) versus chloral hydrate (23.5 min).
- Propofol group had the shortest discharge time (53.9 min), while chloral hydrate showed more movement (22.5%) and sedation failures.
Conclusions:
- A tiered sedation approach is feasible for infant MRI.
- Chloral hydrate offers a safer cardiorespiratory profile but may compromise imaging quality due to movement.
- Propofol provides faster scanning and discharge but requires closer physician titration due to higher cardiorespiratory event rates.
Abstract:
Most studies report the efficacy of only a single drug to achieve sedation in a broad age range of children. In clinical practice, a variety of sedative and anesthetic regimes are monitored by nurses and physicians. In this study we report the efficacy of a tiered approach to monitoring and sedation in infants. Two-hundred-fifty-eight infants who required magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) studies received either oral chloral hydrate (n = 102) or bolus doses of IV pentobarbital (n = 67) monitored by nurses or IV propofol infusion (n = 68) titrated by physicians. Fewer cardiorespiratory events were observed in the chloral hydrate group (2.9%) compared to pentobarbital (13.4%) and propofol groups (13.6%); P < 0.05, propofol versus chloral hydrate. Infants who received propofol were ready to begin MRI scanning earlier (mean 9.1 +/- 6.7 min) than infants who received oral chloral hydrate (mean 23.5 +/- 13.4 min; P < 0.05). The time to discharge was longest in the pentobarbital (mean 80.3 +/- 39.2 min) and shortest in the propofol group (mean 53.9 +/- 30.1 min; P < 0.05). Infants in the chloral hydrate group moved more frequently (22.5%) during MRI scanning (with four sedation failures of 102) compared to 12.2% in the pentobarbital group and 1.4% in the propofol group (P < 0.001).
Related Concept Videos
Imaging Studies I: CT and MRI
Description of the Procedures
Computed Tomography (CT) scan:
Computed Tomography (CT) scans use X-ray technology to generate detailed images of bones, organs, and tissues. During the scan, the patient lies on a moving table...
Imaging Studies for Cardiovascular System IV: CMRI
Parenteral Anesthetics: Overview
Imaging Studies IV: Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Inhalational Anesthetics: Overview