Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Calibration Curves: Linear Least Squares01:20

Calibration Curves: Linear Least Squares

A calibration curve is a plot of the instrument's response against a series of known concentrations of a substance. This curve is used to set the instrument response levels, using the substance and its concentrations as standards. Alternatively, or additionally, an equation is fitted to the calibration curve plot and subsequently used to calculate the unknown concentrations of other samples reliably.
For data that follow a straight line, the standard method for fitting is the linear...
Influence of Earth's Curvature and Atmospheric Refraction on Leveling01:26

Influence of Earth's Curvature and Atmospheric Refraction on Leveling

During leveling, the Earth's curvature and atmospheric refraction introduce deviations in the line of sight from a true horizontal reference. When the line of sight is leveled, it remains perpendicular to the plumb line only at a single point. Beyond this, it deviates due to the Earth’s curvature, represented by the correction C. For a sight distance D, the deviation can be derived using the relationship:This relationship shows that the deviation increases quadratically with distance. Over a...
Calibration Curves: Correlation Coefficient01:10

Calibration Curves: Correlation Coefficient

In a linear calibration curve, there is a value called the calibration coefficient, denoted by 'r,' which measures the strength and the direction of association between two variables. The correlation coefficient value ranges from −1 to +1. A value of +1 indicates a perfect positive linear correlation, −1 denotes a perfect negative correlation, and 0 implies no correlation between the two variables. A positive correlation value establishes that as one variable increases, the other increases, and...
Instrument Calibration01:12

Instrument Calibration

Instrument calibration is essential for ensuring that instruments produce accurate and consistent results. It is vital in manufacturing, healthcare, testing laboratories, and scientific research. Calibration processes are specific to each instrument and help enhance data accuracy. Each instrument has a unique calibration process tailored to its design and function to improve data accuracy.
Analytical Balance Calibration
An analytical balance measures mass and requires regular calibration to...
Perceptual Constancy01:12

Perceptual Constancy

Perceptual constancy is the ability to recognize that objects remain consistent and unchanged even when their appearance varies due to changes in sensory input. There are four main types of perceptual constancy: size constancy, shape constancy, color constancy, and brightness constancy.
Size constancy is the recognition that an object remains the same size, even when its image on the retina changes. For instance, a bus is perceived to be large enough to carry people, even if it looks tiny from...
Uncertainty in Measurement: Accuracy and Precision03:37

Uncertainty in Measurement: Accuracy and Precision

Scientists typically make repeated measurements of a quantity to ensure the quality of their findings and to evaluate both the precision and the accuracy of their results. Measurements are said to be precise if they yield very similar results when repeated in the same manner. A measurement is considered accurate if it yields a result that is very close to the true or the accepted value. Precise values agree with each other; accurate values agree with a true value.

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Visual perception of longitudinal waves: theory and observations.

Scientific reports·2026
Same author

Is there more to adaptation than meets the eye?

Vision research·2026
Same author

The Impact of Induced Optical Blur on Monocular and Binocular Depth-Related Visuomotor Task Performance.

Investigative ophthalmology & visual science·2025
Same author

A visual search asymmetry for plaids.

Perception·2025
Same author

Depth-Related Visuomotor Performance in Keratoconus and Its Relationship to Stereopsis.

Investigative ophthalmology & visual science·2025
Same author

RIPK3 in necroptosis and cancer.

Molecules and cells·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jul 19, 2026

Eye Tracking During Visually Situated Language Comprehension: Flexibility and Limitations in Uncovering Visual Context Effects
07:36

Eye Tracking During Visually Situated Language Comprehension: Flexibility and Limitations in Uncovering Visual Context Effects

Published on: November 30, 2018

Stochastic re-calibration: contextual effects on perceived tilt.

Joshua A Solomon1, Michael J Morgan

  • 1Department of Optometry and Visual Science, City University, London EC1V 0HB, UK. j.a.solomon@city.ac.uk

Proceedings. Biological Sciences
|September 28, 2006
PubMed
Summary

The visual system exaggerates line tilt differences, causing illusions. Oblique flanks reduce foveal acuity for tilt changes, suggesting stochastic recalibration, not lateral inhibition.

More Related Videos

Measuring Sensitivity to Viewpoint Change with and without Stereoscopic Cues
08:04

Measuring Sensitivity to Viewpoint Change with and without Stereoscopic Cues

Published on: December 4, 2013

Using Eye-tracking to Assess the Relative Importance of Visual and Vestibular Input to Subcortical Motion Processing in the Roll Plane
07:24

Using Eye-tracking to Assess the Relative Importance of Visual and Vestibular Input to Subcortical Motion Processing in the Roll Plane

Published on: August 22, 2025

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jul 19, 2026

Eye Tracking During Visually Situated Language Comprehension: Flexibility and Limitations in Uncovering Visual Context Effects
07:36

Eye Tracking During Visually Situated Language Comprehension: Flexibility and Limitations in Uncovering Visual Context Effects

Published on: November 30, 2018

Measuring Sensitivity to Viewpoint Change with and without Stereoscopic Cues
08:04

Measuring Sensitivity to Viewpoint Change with and without Stereoscopic Cues

Published on: December 4, 2013

Using Eye-tracking to Assess the Relative Importance of Visual and Vestibular Input to Subcortical Motion Processing in the Roll Plane
07:24

Using Eye-tracking to Assess the Relative Importance of Visual and Vestibular Input to Subcortical Motion Processing in the Roll Plane

Published on: August 22, 2025

Area of Science:

  • Visual perception
  • Human visual system
  • Psychophysics

Background:

  • The human visual system exhibits a tilt illusion, exaggerating differences between adjacent line or grating orientations.
  • Previous research has not fully elucidated the mechanisms underlying foveal tilt illusions and their interaction with surrounding elements.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the impact of flanking stimuli on the foveal tilt illusion.
  • To determine whether flanker orientation affects contrast sensitivity or acuity for tilt changes.
  • To explore the underlying mechanisms of flank-induced acuity loss in the fovea.

Main Methods:

  • Psychophysical experiments measuring tilt perception and contrast sensitivity.
  • Systematic variation of flanker orientation relative to a central target.
  • Analysis of acuity for small tilt changes in the presence of various flanks.

Main Results:

  • Oblique flanks significantly reduced visual acuity for small tilt changes in the central visual field.
  • Flankers, regardless of their orientation, did not decrease contrast sensitivity.
  • The observed effects suggest a recalibration of the reference orientation rather than orientation-selective lateral inhibition or conventional crowding.

Conclusions:

  • The foveal tilt illusion is not caused by orientation-selective lateral inhibition.
  • Flank-induced acuity loss in the fovea can be explained by stochastic recalibration of the perceived reference orientation.
  • This recalibration mechanism offers a novel explanation for visual illusions affecting orientation perception.