Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 19, 2026
08:24
The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies
Published on: August 25, 2023
Impulsive decision-making: learning to gamble wisely?
Joseph Glicksohn1, Revital Naor-Ziv, Rotem Leshem
1Department of Criminology, The Leslie and Susan Gonda (Goldschmied) Multidisciplinary Brain Research Center, Bar-Ilan University, Ramat Gan 52100, Israel. chanita@bgumail.bgu.ac.il
Cognition
|September 30, 2006
Summary
Many individuals, even healthy ones, struggle with decision-making tasks, showing poor performance. This suggests focusing on individual performance profiles rather than just clinical groups is crucial for understanding decision-making.
Area of Science:
- Neuroscience
- Cognitive Psychology
- Behavioral Economics
Background:
- The Bechara Gambling Task (GT) was developed to simulate real-world decision-making.
- The GT has been widely used with patient groups (e.g., substance abusers) and healthy controls.
- Previous studies often highlight impaired performance in patient groups compared to controls.
Purpose of the Study:
- To re-evaluate the performance of normal individuals on the computerized Gambling Task.
- To investigate the prevalence of poor performance in healthy populations.
- To propose a shift in analytical focus from group comparisons to individual performance profiles.
Main Methods:
- Utilized a computerized version of the Bechara Gambling Task.
- Analyzed performance data from a cohort of normal individuals.
- Examined individual performance patterns to identify learning deficits.
Main Results:
- A significant proportion (46%) of normal individuals demonstrated poor performance on the GT, indicating a failure to learn.
- This finding challenges the assumption of consistent good performance in healthy controls.
- Individual performance variability was observed across the healthy cohort.
Conclusions:
- Poor performance on the GT is not exclusive to clinical populations and occurs frequently in healthy individuals.
- Clinical classification may be less informative than analyzing individual decision-making profiles.
- Future research should prioritize examining individual data and performance patterns over solely contrasting group means.
Related Concept Videos
01:37Reason and Intuition
The human brain processes information for decision-making using one of two routes: an intuitive system and a rational system (Epstein, 1994; popularized by Kahneman, 2011 as System 1 and System 2, respectively). The intuitive system is quick, impulsive, and operates with minimal effort, relying on emotions or habits to provide cues for what to do next, while the rational system is logical, analytical, deliberate, and methodical. Research in neuropsychology suggests that the brain can only use...
01:20Decision Making
Decision-making is a fundamental cognitive process that involves evaluating alternatives and selecting among them. This process can range from simple choices, such as deciding what to wear, to complex decisions, like choosing a major in college or a career path. The complexity of the decision often dictates the approach we use, which can be broadly categorized into two types: automatic and controlled decision-making.
Automatic decision-making is fast, intuitive, and relies on gut feelings...
Automatic decision-making is fast, intuitive, and relies on gut feelings...
01:14Decision Making: Traditional Method
The process of hypothesis testing based on the traditional method includes calculating the critical value, testing the value of the test statistic using the sample data, and interpreting these values.
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is decided based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to this claim is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses, out of which a null hypothesis would be a...
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is decided based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to this claim is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses, out of which a null hypothesis would be a...
01:08Timing and Consequences on Behavior
In operant conditioning, the timing of reinforcement is crucial. For animals like rats and cats, immediate reinforcement (within a few seconds) is much more effective than delayed reinforcement. For example, a food reward for a rat needs to follow within 30 seconds of pressing a bar to be effective.
Humans, however, can respond to delayed reinforcers. We often make decisions between immediate small rewards and delayed larger rewards. This ability to delay gratification is a significant factor...
Humans, however, can respond to delayed reinforcers. We often make decisions between immediate small rewards and delayed larger rewards. This ability to delay gratification is a significant factor...
01:09Decision Making: P-value Method
The process of hypothesis testing based on the P-value method includes calculating the P- value using the sample data and interpreting it.
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is proposed. The claim is based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to the claim is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses: a null hypothesis would be a neutral statement while the alternative hypothesis can have a...
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is proposed. The claim is based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to the claim is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses: a null hypothesis would be a neutral statement while the alternative hypothesis can have a...
01:05Instinctive Drift
Instinctive drift refers to the tendency of animals to revert to their innate behaviors despite repeated reinforcement. Breland and Breland demonstrated this concept in an experiment with a raccoon. The raccoon was trained to pick up two coins and place them in a container in exchange for food. Initially, the raccoon learned to associate the coins with food, making them a conditioned stimulus or a substitute for food. However, over time, the raccoon became less willing to put the coins into the...