Dihydrodiol dehydrogenase in drug resistance and sensitivity of human carcinomas

Bih Fang Pan1, J Arly Nelson

  • 1Department of Molecular Pathology, Unit 951, The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Boulevard, PO Box 301429, Houston, TX 77230-1429, USA. bpan@mdanderson.org

Insights

This study investigated drug resistance in renal cell carcinoma, finding that dihydrodiol dehydrogenase (DDH) underexpression explains cross-resistance to 2-chlorodeoxyadenosine and collateral sensitivity to fludarabine.

Area of Science:

  • Biochemistry
  • Molecular Biology
  • Oncology

Background:

  • Human renal cell carcinoma (Caki-dTub) exhibits cross-resistance to 2-chlorodeoxyadenosine (CldAdo) and collateral sensitivity to fludarabine (FaraA), contrary to typical drug resistance patterns.
  • Both CldAdo and FaraA, in their triphosphate forms, induce apoptosis by binding to Apaf-1, leading to caspase 9 and caspase 3 activation.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To elucidate the molecular mechanisms underlying the observed cross-resistance and collateral sensitivity to CldAdo and FaraA in Caki-dTub cells.
  • To investigate the role of dihydrodiol dehydrogenase (DDH) in mediating these drug responses.

Main Methods:

  • Comparative analysis of caspase 3 activity in wild-type and Caki-dTub cell lines treated with CldAdo and FaraA.
  • Assessment of drug pathway involvement using a caspase 9 inhibitor (Z-LEHD-FMK).
  • Differential display and enzyme analysis to identify differences in enzyme expression between cell lines; stable transfection to restore enzyme function.

Main Results:

  • Caspase 3 activation by CldAdo and FaraA paralleled cell viability changes, with CldAdo showing 200-fold resistance and FaraA showing 20-fold collateral sensitivity.
  • Caspase 9 inhibition blocked drug-induced caspase 3 activation, confirming a shared apoptotic pathway.
  • Dihydrodiol dehydrogenase (DDH) was significantly underexpressed in Caki-dTub cells compared to Caki-1 cells. Restoration of DDH via transfection partially reversed CldAdo resistance.

Conclusions:

  • Underexpression of dihydrodiol dehydrogenase (DDH) is a key factor in the cross-resistance to CldAdo and collateral sensitivity to FaraA in this renal cell carcinoma model.
  • The findings suggest DDH expression levels can modulate responses to nucleoside analogs, offering potential therapeutic insights.
  • While Apaf-1 mutations were considered, DDH's role aligns with recent findings in other cancer types, highlighting its broader significance in drug resistance.

Related Concept Videos

Treatment Resistant Cancers02:56

Treatment Resistant Cancers

Cancer is the second leading cause of death in the United States. A cancer cell is genetically unstable and hence can mutate faster. They can also modify their microenvironment and escape immune surveillance. The difficulties in treating cancer are further compounded by the emergence of rapid resistance to anticancer drugs. The most common ways to attain resistance in cancer cells include alteration in drug transport and metabolism, modification of drug target, elevated DNA damage response, or...
Drug toxicity: Idiosyncratic Reactions01:16

Drug toxicity: Idiosyncratic Reactions

Idiosyncratic drug reactions represent abnormal chemical responses that vary significantly among individuals, ranging from extreme sensitivity to low doses to insensitivity to high doses. These reactions often occur due to the drug's covalent binding with serum proteins, forming a foreign hapten that triggers an immunotoxicological response. The variability in drug reactions has a strong pharmacogenetic foundation, with genetic differences crucial in how individuals metabolize drugs. For...
Mutagenicity and Carcinogenicity01:25

Mutagenicity and Carcinogenicity

Mutagenicity and carcinogenicity refer to the ability of drugs to cause genetic defects and induce cancer, respectively. The International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) classifies agents into four groups based on their carcinogenic potential. Group 1 agents are known human carcinogens; group 2A agents are probably carcinogenic to humans; group 3 agents lack data to support their role in carcinogenesis; and group 4 includes agents for which data support that they are not likely to be...