Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Ethical issues in neuroscience.

Thomas Fuchs1

  • 1Psychiatric Department, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany. thomas_fuchs@med.uni-heidelberg.de

Current Opinion in Psychiatry
|October 3, 2006
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Progress and ongoing conceptual challenges "on the way to integrative human neuroscience"-ten years after.

Frontiers in integrative neuroscience·2026
Same author

The experiential basis of concepts: integrating embodied and enactive accounts.

Frontiers in psychology·2026
Same author

Cracks in the pattern: Gallagher's theory of the self and the dynamics of schizophrenic selfhood.

Frontiers in psychiatry·2025
Same author

The Sense of Self and Interpersonal Functioning in Borderline Personality Disorder: Toward Qualitative Evidence-Based Phenomenological Conceptualization.

Qualitative health research·2025
Same author

EAIE Scale: The Examination of Autistic Intersubjective Experiences - A Qualitative Tool to the Exploration of Sociality.

Psychopathology·2025
Same author

Autism spectrum disorder and schizophrenia: a phenomenological comparison.

Frontiers in psychiatry·2025
Same journal

Neuroimaging in older-age bipolar disorder.

Current opinion in psychiatry·2026
Same journal

Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation treatment for obsessive-compulsive disorder.

Current opinion in psychiatry·2026
Same journal

Pharmacological maintenance treatment in older age bipolar disorder.

Current opinion in psychiatry·2026
Same journal

Harmful behaviours and suicide in later life bipolar disorder.

Current opinion in psychiatry·2026
Same journal

Urbanization, wildfire exposure, and youth mental health: a narrative review.

Current opinion in psychiatry·2026
Same journal

Bipolar disorder and the risk of developing dementia - a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Current opinion in psychiatry·2026
See all related articles

Neuroscience advances prompt neuroethics, examining ethical dilemmas in brain interventions. Careful consideration of benefits versus harms and human concepts is crucial for societal impact.

Area of Science:

  • Neuroscience
  • Neuroethics
  • Philosophy of Mind

Background:

  • Neuroscience research increasingly identifies and intervenes in neural correlates of cognition and behavior.
  • This progress raises significant ethical, social, and legal questions regarding the human person and the brain.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To provide an overview of the ethical questions emerging from advancements in neuroscience.
  • To analyze the implications of neuroscientific findings and technologies on fundamental human concepts.

Main Methods:

  • Review of ethical issues arising from neuroscientific research and its applications.
  • Philosophical analysis of neuroscientific results and their impact on concepts like free will and personhood.
  • Examination of technologies such as psychopharmacology, psychosurgery, and neuroimplants.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • The emergence of neuroethics as a discipline to address these challenges.
  • Identification of key ethical concerns including disease prediction, cognitive enhancement, and privacy.
  • Neuroscientific reductionism challenges traditional notions of free will, responsibility, and the self.
  • Potential impact on psychiatric concepts of mental health and illness.

Conclusions:

  • Neuroscience advances necessitate careful weighing of potential benefits against harms for both healthy and mentally ill individuals.
  • Interdisciplinary and public debate is essential to address the ethical, social, and legal implications.
  • Critical evaluation of underlying conceptions of humans is required in light of neuroscientific progress.