Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 19, 2026

Design of Cecal Ligation and Puncture and Intranasal Infection Dual Model of Sepsis-Induced Immunosuppression
Published on: June 15, 2019
New evaluation therapies for sepsis
G Deby-Dupont1, P P Damas, M Lamy
1Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care, University Hospital, B 35, and Centre for Oxygen Research and Development (CORD), Institut de Chimie, B6a, Domaine Universitaire du Sart Tilman, 4000 Liège, Belgium.
Abstract:
This article presents an analysis of the literature of the last 2 years on the treatment of sepsis and septic shock. It appears that most of the antimediator therapies applied in phase II or III clinical trials yielded disappointing results. But, many other therapeutic approaches are proposed or are ongoing, and many papers report critical analysis of the reasons for the lack of success of past clinical trials.
Insights
Recent sepsis and septic shock treatments show disappointing results from antimediator therapies. Ongoing research explores new approaches and analyzes past clinical trial failures to improve patient outcomes.
Area of Science:
- Critical care medicine
- Infectious diseases
- Pharmacology
Background:
- Sepsis and septic shock remain leading causes of mortality worldwide.
- Effective treatment strategies are urgently needed to improve patient survival rates.
- Recent advances in understanding sepsis pathophysiology have spurred novel therapeutic development.
Purpose of the Study:
- To review and analyze recent literature (last 2 years) on sepsis and septic shock treatment.
- To evaluate the efficacy of various therapeutic approaches, particularly antimediator therapies.
- To identify reasons for the limited success of past clinical trials in sepsis treatment.
Main Methods:
- Comprehensive literature search of databases for studies published in the last two years.
- Systematic review and critical analysis of clinical trial data, focusing on phase II and III studies.
- Synthesis of findings regarding the effectiveness of different treatment modalities.
Main Results:
- Most antimediator therapies evaluated in recent phase II/III clinical trials have shown disappointing outcomes.
- Despite setbacks, numerous novel therapeutic strategies are under investigation or in development.
- Published analyses highlight critical factors contributing to the failure of previous clinical trials.
Conclusions:
- Current antimediator therapies for sepsis and septic shock have largely failed to demonstrate significant clinical benefit.
- Future research must focus on innovative therapeutic targets and rigorous trial design.
- Understanding the reasons behind past failures is crucial for advancing sepsis treatment.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Acute Pyelonephritis II: Diagnostic Studies and Management
Pneumonia IV: Management
Bacterial Pneumonia Treatment
For bacterial pneumonia, antibiotics serve as the cornerstone of therapy. Initial treatment often begins with empirical antibiotics, tailored to the anticipated causative organism and adjusted based on culture results. Key antibiotic choices include:
Endocarditis IV: Nursing Management
Pneumonia III: Complications and Assessment
Heart Failure VI: Adjunct Therapies
Pulmonary Embolism II: Diagnostic Studies and Interprofessional Care
