Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Types of Selection01:46

Types of Selection

43.7K
Natural selection influences the frequencies of particular alleles and phenotypes within populations in several different ways. Primarily, natural selection can be directional, stabilizing, or disruptive. Directional selection favors one extreme trait and shifts the population towards that phenotype while selecting against individuals displaying alternate traits. Stabilizing selection favors an intermediate trait with a narrow range of variation. Deviation from the optimal phenotype towards an...
43.7K
Genetics of Speciation02:16

Genetics of Speciation

20.7K
Speciation is the evolutionary process resulting in the formation of new, distinct species—groups of reproductively isolated populations.
20.7K
Speciation Rates01:07

Speciation Rates

22.5K
Overview
22.5K
Formation of Species01:31

Formation of Species

44.4K
Speciation describes the formation of one or more new species from one or sometimes multiple original species. The resulting species are discrete from the parent species, and barriers to reproduction will typically exist. There are two primary mechanisms, speciation with and without geographic isolation—allopatric and sympatric speciation, respectively.
44.4K
Convergent Evolution01:54

Convergent Evolution

31.2K
Evolution shapes the features of organisms over time, ensuring that they are suited for the environments in which they live. Sometimes, selection pressure leads to the rise of similar but unrelated adaptations in organisms with no recent common ancestors, a process known as convergent evolution.
31.2K
The Evidence for Evolution02:55

The Evidence for Evolution

47.4K
Genetic variations accumulating within populations over generations give rise to biological evolution. Evolutionary changes can result in the formation of novel varieties and entire new species. These changes are responsible for the diverse forms of life inhabiting the planet. The evidence for evolution suggests that all living organisms descended from common ancestors.
47.4K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

<i>Phenasurya daeng</i>, a new genus and species of plexippine jumping spider (Salticidae, Plexippini, Plexippina) from Thailand.

ZooKeys·2025
Same author

PhyIN: trimming alignments by phylogenetic incompatibilities among neighbouring sites.

PeerJ·2024
Same author

Erratum: KUN YU, QUANG DUY HOANG, WAYNE P. MADDISON & JUNXIA ZHANG (2023) Review of Chalcovietnamicus Marusik, 1991, with description of four new species (Araneae, Salticidae, Euophryini). Zootaxa, 5336 (4): 451-480.

Zootaxa·2024
Same author

Erratum: KUN YU, WAYNE P. MADDISON & JUNXIA ZHANG (2023) Taxonomic revision of Orcevia Thorell, 1890, with description of fifteen new species (Araneae, Salticidae, Euophryini). Zootaxa, 5384 (1): 1-79.

Zootaxa·2024
Same author

Clarifying the phylogenetic placement of Eupoinae Maddison, 2015 (Araneae, Salticidae) with ultra-conserved element data.

ZooKeys·2024
Same author

<i>Tenkana</i>, a new genus of jumping spiders (Salticidae, Plexippina) from South Asia, with the new Indian species <i>Tenkanajayamangali</i>.

ZooKeys·2024

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jan 1, 2026

Visually Sexing Loggerhead Shrike Lanius Ludovicianus Using Plumage Coloration and Pattern
04:10

Visually Sexing Loggerhead Shrike Lanius Ludovicianus Using Plumage Coloration and Pattern

Published on: March 8, 2020

6.5K

Confounding asymmetries in evolutionary diversification and character change.

Wayne P Maddison1

  • 1Department of Zoology, Biodiversity Research Centre, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia V6T 1Z4. wmaddisn@interchange.ubc.ca

Evolution; International Journal of Organic Evolution
|October 5, 2006
PubMed
Summary

Character evolution can influence phylogenetic tree shape, potentially biasing evolutionary studies. Unifying models for diversification and character change is crucial for accurate phylogenetic inference.

More Related Videos

Microinjection for Transgenesis and Genome Editing in Threespine Sticklebacks
08:51

Microinjection for Transgenesis and Genome Editing in Threespine Sticklebacks

Published on: May 13, 2016

14.5K
Dissection and Flat-mounting of the Threespine Stickleback Branchial Skeleton
08:02

Dissection and Flat-mounting of the Threespine Stickleback Branchial Skeleton

Published on: May 7, 2016

10.2K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jan 1, 2026

Visually Sexing Loggerhead Shrike Lanius Ludovicianus Using Plumage Coloration and Pattern
04:10

Visually Sexing Loggerhead Shrike Lanius Ludovicianus Using Plumage Coloration and Pattern

Published on: March 8, 2020

6.5K
Microinjection for Transgenesis and Genome Editing in Threespine Sticklebacks
08:51

Microinjection for Transgenesis and Genome Editing in Threespine Sticklebacks

Published on: May 13, 2016

14.5K
Dissection and Flat-mounting of the Threespine Stickleback Branchial Skeleton
08:02

Dissection and Flat-mounting of the Threespine Stickleback Branchial Skeleton

Published on: May 7, 2016

10.2K

Area of Science:

  • Evolutionary biology
  • Phylogenetics
  • Computational biology

Background:

  • Phylogenetic studies often assume tree shape is independent of character evolution.
  • This assumption can lead to biased inferences if characters influence tree topology.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the impact of asymmetrical speciation and character change on phylogenetic inference.
  • To highlight the need for integrated models of diversification and character evolution.

Main Methods:

  • Simulations were used to model asymmetrical speciation rates between character states.
  • Simulations also modeled asymmetrical rates of character change.
  • The resulting phylogenetic data were analyzed to assess potential misinterpretations.

Main Results:

  • Asymmetrical speciation can be misinterpreted as asymmetrical character change.
  • Asymmetrical character change can be misinterpreted as asymmetrical speciation.
  • Current methods may fail to distinguish between these two processes.

Conclusions:

  • The interplay between character evolution and diversification is complex.
  • Joint models are needed to accurately infer evolutionary processes.
  • Further research is required to successfully disentangle biased diversification and character change.