Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 19, 2026

An Experimental Analysis of Children's Ability to Provide a False Report about a Crime
Published on: May 3, 2016
Criminal-thinking styles and illegal behavior among college students: validation of the PICTS
Katrina McCoy1, William Fremouw, Elizabeth Tyner
1Department of Psychology, West Virginia University, 1124 Life Sciences Building, 53 Campus Drive, Morgantown, WV 26506, USA.
Abstract:
The present study examined the relation of self-reported criminal-thinking styles and self-reported illegal behavior among college students. Participants were 177 male and 216 female (N=393) undergraduate students. Participants were divided by gender and further classified into four groups of self-reported illegal behavior: control-status offenses, drug crimes, property crimes, and violent crimes against people. The psychological inventory of criminal-thinking styles (PICTS) (1) measured criminal-thinking patterns on eight scales. Results indicated that males who committed violent crimes against people endorsed significantly higher levels of distorted criminal-thinking patterns on all scales than the control-status offenses, and drug crimes groups. Interestingly, female participants who committed property crimes displayed six significantly elevated PICTS scales whereas females with violent crimes against people had significant elevations on only four of the criminal-thinking style scales. These results extend Walter's initial validation of the PICTS with incarcerated respondents to a non-incarcerated population and show potential use of the PICTS with other populations.
Related Concept Videos
Revisionist Views of Adolescent and Adult Cognition
Deindividuation
Reliability and Validity
The Stanford Prison Experiment
Theory of Attribution II: Kelley's Covariation Theory
Cross-Sectional Research