Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 19, 2026

15:17
Colorectal Cancer Cell Surface Protein Profiling Using an Antibody Microarray and Fluorescence Multiplexing
Published on: September 25, 2011
Tissue microarray FISH applied to colorectal carcinomas with various microsatellite status
Krzysztof Okoń1, Anna Sińczak-Kuta, Agnieszka Klimkowska
1Department of Pathomorphology, Collegium Medicum, Jagiellonian University, Kraków.
Summary
This study investigated colorectal carcinoma molecular subtypes using FISH to analyze chromosomes 1, 8, 17, and 18. Findings indicate these chromosomal analyses are insufficient for distinguishing microsatellite-stable (MSS) from microsatellite-unstable (MSI-H/MSI-L) colorectal cancers.
Area of Science:
- Oncology
- Genetics
- Molecular Biology
Background:
- Colorectal carcinoma (CRC) exhibits etiological heterogeneity, developing via chromosomal instability or DNA repair defects leading to microsatellite instability (MSI).
- CRC classification includes microsatellite-stable (MSS), highly microsatellite unstable (MSI-H), and low-level microsatellite unstable (MSI-L) subtypes.
- Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) is a nucleic acid detection method utilizing fluorescent probes for specific DNA fragment identification.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the utility of FISH in analyzing chromosomal copy numbers for specific chromosomes (1, 8, 17, 18) in different molecular subtypes of colorectal carcinoma.
- To determine if chromosomal aberrations detected by FISH can differentiate between microsatellite-stable (MSS) and microsatellite-unstable (MSI-H, MSI-L) colorectal cancers.
Main Methods:
- Analysis of 146 colorectal carcinoma cases using histopathological evaluation and tissue microarrays.
- FISH was performed using probes for chromosomes 1, 8, 17, and 18.
- Microsatellite instability was assessed using PCR on frozen tissue samples.
Main Results:
- Mean signal counts for chromosomes 1 and 17 showed minor variations across MSS, MSI-L, and MSI-H groups, with no statistically significant differences.
- Chromosome 18 consistently showed a mean signal count of 2 across all molecular subtypes.
- Chromosome 8 also exhibited minimal variation in mean signal counts between the different MSI groups.
Conclusions:
- The analyzed chromosomal copy number variations (chromosomes 1, 8, 17, 18) detected by FISH are not sufficient to distinguish between microsatellite-stable and microsatellite-unstable colorectal carcinoma subtypes.
- Further research may be needed to identify other chromosomal targets or methodologies for molecular subtyping of colorectal cancer.
