Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Lagrange Multipliers: Two Constraints

Lagrange Multipliers: Two Constraints

The method of Lagrange multipliers with two constraints is used to optimize a function subject to two independent constraints. In many applications, the objective function represents a quantity to be maximized or minimized, such as cost, area, distance, or energy. The two constraints represent requirements that the solution must satisfy, such as fixed volume, limited resources, or prescribed dimensions.For a function of three variables, each constraint forms a surface in three-dimensional space.

Polar Coordinates: Problem Solving

Polar Coordinates: Problem Solving

Directional radiation patterns are central to antenna analysis, as they illustrate how signal strength varies with direction. These patterns are often modeled using polar plots, where the radial distance from the origin represents signal intensity at a given angle. A commonly used idealized form is the four-lobed rose curve, which captures the concept of directional beams in a simplified mathematical form.The four-lobed rose curve, described by r = cos⁡(2θ), features four symmetric lobes, each...

Linear Approximations

Linear Approximations

For a differentiable function of two variables, linear approximation estimates values near a known point by replacing the curved surface with its tangent plane. Consider the function\begin{equation*}f(x,y)=x^2+3y^2\end{equation*}near the point (2, 1). The exact value at this point is f(2, 1) = 22 + 3(1)2 = 4 + 3 = 7.The linear approximation of f(x, y)) near (a, b) is\begin{equation*}L(x,y)=f(a,b)+f_x(a,b)(x-a)+f_y(a,b)(y-b)\end{equation*}First, compute the partial derivatives: fx(x, y) = 2x and...

Dosage Regimen Designs: Nomograms and Tabulations

Dosage Regimen Designs: Nomograms and Tabulations

Nomograms and tabulations are vital tools used by clinicians to design accurate and individualized dosage regimens. These instruments provide a straightforward method for adjusting dosages based on individual patient characteristics, including age, weight, and physiological condition. The foundation of a drug's nomogram is population pharmacokinetic data collected and analyzed using specific models. This data simplifies complex equations, presenting them diagrammatically or tabularly for easy...

Methods of Medium Optimization

Methods of Medium Optimization

Optimizing growth media enhances microbial proliferation and maximizes product yield. Statistical experimental design methodologies provide structured and reproducible approaches, offering progressively higher levels of robustness and efficiency.The One-Factor-at-a-Time (OFAT) MethodThe One-Factor-at-a-Time (OFAT) method involves adjusting a single variable while keeping all others constant. However, it cannot detect interactions between variables, often leading to suboptimal outcomes when...

Radiation Pressure: Problem Solving

Radiation Pressure: Problem Solving

The radiation pressure applied by an electromagnetic wave on a perfectly absorbing surface equals the energy density of the wave. The wave's momentum also gets transferred to the surface when an electromagnetic wave is entirely absorbed by it. The rate at which momentum is transmitted to an absorbing surface perpendicular to the propagation direction equals the force on the surface.
The average value of the rate of momentum transfer divided by the absorbing area represents the average force per...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Biology Over Monotherapy: Mature Results From European Organisation For Research and Treatment of Cancer 22033-26033 Reaffirm Molecular Stratification, Not Treatment Sequence, Defines Prognosis in Low-Grade Glioma.

Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology·2026

Same author

Long-term outcomes and late effects of surgery and radiotherapy in adult intracranial ependymoma patients.

Journal of neuro-oncology·2026

Same author

Bi-level multi-criteria optimization for risk-informed radiotherapy.

Physics in medicine and biology·2026

Same author

No Evidence for Depletion of Circulating Lymphocyte Populations in Primary Brain Tumor Patients Receiving Radiation Therapy Alone.

International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics·2026

Same author

Evaluation of robust central nervous system treatment planning on a compact, gantry-less proton therapy system.

Physics in medicine and biology·2026

Same author

Rethinking the role of surgery and radiotherapy in BRAF-mutant papillary craniopharyngioma: a position statement from the neurosurgical perspective.

Neurosurgical focus·2026

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jul 19, 2026

Proton Therapy Delivery and Its Clinical Application in Select Solid Tumor Malignancies

Proton Therapy Delivery and Its Clinical Application in Select Solid Tumor Malignancies

Published on: February 6, 2019

Approximating convex pareto surfaces in multiobjective radiotherapy planning.

David L Craft¹, Tarek F Halabi, Helen A Shih

¹Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts 02114, USA. dcraft@partners.org

Medical Physics

|October 7, 2006

Summary

This study introduces a new algorithm to optimize radiotherapy plans, balancing tumor coverage and normal tissue sparing. It generates a database of Pareto optimal plans for personalized cancer treatment strategies.

More Related Videos

Radiation Planning Assistant - A Web-based Tool to Support High-quality Radiotherapy in Clinics with Limited Resources

Radiation Planning Assistant - A Web-based Tool to Support High-quality Radiotherapy in Clinics with Limited Resources

Published on: October 6, 2023

Radiation Planning Assistant - A Streamlined, Fully Automated Radiotherapy Treatment Planning System

Radiation Planning Assistant - A Streamlined, Fully Automated Radiotherapy Treatment Planning System

Published on: April 11, 2018

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jul 19, 2026

Proton Therapy Delivery and Its Clinical Application in Select Solid Tumor Malignancies

Proton Therapy Delivery and Its Clinical Application in Select Solid Tumor Malignancies

Published on: February 6, 2019

Radiation Planning Assistant - A Web-based Tool to Support High-quality Radiotherapy in Clinics with Limited Resources

Radiation Planning Assistant - A Web-based Tool to Support High-quality Radiotherapy in Clinics with Limited Resources

Published on: October 6, 2023

Radiation Planning Assistant - A Streamlined, Fully Automated Radiotherapy Treatment Planning System

Radiation Planning Assistant - A Streamlined, Fully Automated Radiotherapy Treatment Planning System

Published on: April 11, 2018

Area of Science:

Medical Physics
Radiation Oncology
Computational Optimization

Background:

Radiotherapy planning faces a fundamental conflict between maximizing tumor dose and minimizing damage to surrounding healthy tissues.
Understanding and quantifying these tradeoffs is crucial for personalized cancer treatment.

Purpose of the Study:

To develop and present an algorithm for computing Pareto optimal treatment plans in radiotherapy.
To investigate the tradeoffs between tumor coverage and critical organ sparing on a case-by-case basis.

Main Methods:

The study proposes an algorithm to compute well-distributed points on the Pareto optimal surface of multiobjective optimization problems.
This algorithm is applied to intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) inverse planning.
The method is demonstrated on three- and four-dimensional treatment planning cases for prostate and skull base cancers.

Main Results:

The algorithm successfully generated Pareto optimal plans, illustrating the complex tradeoffs in radiotherapy.
Case studies demonstrated the ability to explore various treatment scenarios balancing tumor control and organ safety.
The approach provides a database of optimal plans for informed clinical decision-making.

Conclusions:

The developed algorithm effectively computes Pareto optimal radiotherapy plans, aiding in the management of treatment tradeoffs.
This method facilitates a deeper understanding of the relationship between tumor coverage and normal tissue sparing for individual patients.
The approach supports personalized radiotherapy by offering a range of optimized treatment options.