Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Proactive interference in a two-tone pitch-comparison task without additional interfering tones.

Timo Ruusuvirta1, Jan Wikgren, Piia Astikainen

  • 1Cognitive Brain Research Unit, Department of Psychology, University of Helsinki, P.O. Box 13, 00014, Helsinki, Finland. timo.ruusuvirta@helsinki.fi

Psychological Research
|October 7, 2006
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Reduced P3 amplitudes during disgust conditioning in individuals with contamination-related obsessive-compulsive symptoms: Evidence from an analogue study.

Journal of affective disorders·2026
Same author

Rapid Mandarin Tone Learning in Passive and Active Listening: A Magnetoencephalography Study.

The European journal of neuroscience·2026
Same author

Effects of Native Language and Exposure to Foreign Language on Categorization and Discrimination of Vowel Duration and Lexical Tone.

Language and speech·2026
Same author

The Somatosensory Mismatch Negativity.

The European journal of neuroscience·2025
Same author

The impact of emotional face distractors on working memory performance: a meta-analysis of behavioural studies.

Cognition & emotion·2025
Same author

N170 Amplitude to Rare Neutral Faces in an Oddball Condition Reflects Prediction Error.

The European journal of neuroscience·2025
Same journal

Musical training increases anticipatory responding and predictive control in sequence learning.

Psychological research·2026
Same journal

When emotions hurt: negative interpretations of bodily signals and interoceptive difficulties in fibromyalgia.

Psychological research·2026
Same journal

Emotion-specific modality effects in auditory and visual perception of emotion.

Psychological research·2026
Same journal

The effect of retrieval practice on incidental memory is modulated by emotional valence: evidence of ERPs.

Psychological research·2026
Same journal

The length of a piece of string: Where the whole is more than the sum of its constituent parts.

Psychological research·2026
Same journal

The influence of older age, individual differences in cognitive abilities, and state of mind on learning novel categories.

Psychological research·2026
See all related articles

This study reveals proactive interference in pitch comparison tasks. Performance degrades when the pitch difference direction repeats, hindering memory for tone sequences.

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Auditory Perception
  • Human Performance

Background:

  • Two-tone pitch-comparison tasks involve successive tone pairs separated by silent intervals.
  • Previous research indicates degraded performance with serial occurrence of these pairs, but the underlying mechanisms are unclear.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the nature of performance degradation in two-tone pitch comparison tasks.
  • To identify the role of proactive interference in auditory memory and comparison.

Main Methods:

  • Human adults participated in a two-tone pitch comparison task.
  • Tones differed by +/- 15 Hz (25 cents) from a base frequency of 1046.5 Hz.
  • The direction of pitch difference was manipulated relative to the preceding pair.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • Identifying the pitch difference direction was easier when it contrasted with the preceding pair.
  • This effect was not explained by simple response patterns.
  • Proactive interference was demonstrated, impacting the memory of tone sequence relationships.

Conclusions:

  • The study confirms proactive interference in two-tone pitch comparison tasks.
  • Difficulty arises in remembering the temporal relationship between successive tone pairs.
  • This interference impacts auditory working memory and performance accuracy.