Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Comment on "Precise domain specification in the developing Drosophila embryo".

Christof M Aegerter1, Tinri Aegerter-Wilmsen

  • 1Fachbereich Physik, University of Konstanz, Universitätstrasse 10, 78457 Konstanz, Germany.

Physical Review. E, Statistical, Nonlinear, and Soft Matter Physics
|October 10, 2006
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Actomyosin-mediated apical constriction promotes physiological germ cell death in C. elegans.

PLoS biology·2024
Same author

An integrated vertex model of the mesoderm invagination during the embryonic development of Drosophila.

Journal of theoretical biology·2023
Same author

Force measurements of Myosin II waves at the yolk surface during Drosophila dorsal closure.

Biophysical journal·2021
Same author

Hydrodynamic stress and phenotypic plasticity of the zebrafish regenerating fin.

The Journal of experimental biology·2021
Same author

Hydrodynamic stress maps on the surface of a flexible fin-like foil.

PloS one·2021
Same author

Distribution and Restoration of Serotonin-Immunoreactive Paraneuronal Cells During Caudal Fin Regeneration in Zebrafish.

Frontiers in molecular neuroscience·2019

The correlated bigradient model may not accurately explain hunchback expression boundary robustness in Drosophila embryos. Experimental conditions and intra-embryo variations challenge the model's predictive power.

Area of Science:

  • Developmental Biology
  • Quantitative Biology
  • Genetics

Background:

  • A correlated bigradient model was proposed to explain the precise boundary of hunchback (hb) gene expression in early Drosophila embryos.
  • This model was suggested to be consistent with experiments showing robust hb boundary formation even when embryo halves develop at different temperatures.

Discussion:

  • The comparison between the model and experimental results is unwarranted due to differing temperature conditions.
  • The model's predictions for precise boundaries are not consistently met across various temperature combinations.
  • Fluctuations within individual embryos (intra-embryo variations) in the bicoid protein profile were not adequately considered.

Key Insights:

  • The robustness of the hunchback expression boundary is questionable under the proposed correlated bigradient model.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Experimental temperature variations were not aligned with the model's parameters, invalidating direct comparisons.
  • Intra-embryo bicoid profile variations significantly disrupt the hb boundary's robustness, even in wild-type embryos.

    • Outlook:

    • Re-evaluation of the correlated bigradient model is needed, incorporating intra-embryo fluctuations.
    • Further experimental and theoretical work is required to understand the mechanisms maintaining hb boundary precision.
    • Exploring alternative models that account for stochasticity in developmental processes is suggested.