Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Search research articles

Related Experiment Videos

First- and third-person approaches in implicit learning research.

Vinciane Gaillard¹, Muriel Vandenberghe, Arnaud Destrebecqz

¹Cognitive Science Research Unit, 50 av. FD Roosevelt (CP 191), 1050 Brussels, Belgium.

Consciousness and Cognition

|October 10, 2006

Summary

This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Sensory horizons, reality monitoring, and the higher-order nature of consciousness: A critical look.

The Behavioral and brain sciences·2026

Same author

Confidence in naturalistic decision making.

Neuroscience of consciousness·2026

Same author

Frequency-tagging as a measure of conscious face perception.

Cortex; a journal devoted to the study of the nervous system and behavior·2026

Same author

Best-of-n decision making by human groups.

PloS one·2026

Same author

When images come to life: a case series.

BMJ neurology open·2026

Same author

Exploring the role of micro-valence in the phenomenal space: insights from similarity judgments and deep learning models.

Neuroscience of consciousness·2026

Same journal

Task-induced transient depersonalization- and derealization-like experiences: a comparative examination of mirror gazing and fixed attention tasks.

Consciousness and cognition·2026

Same journal

Information compression trumps accuracy when viewing groups of faces.

Consciousness and cognition·2026

Same journal

Memory for scene details in eye-movement behavior, with and without awareness.

Consciousness and cognition·2026

Same journal

When one part feels, the whole belongs: associations between local touch referral and illusory full-limb ownership in individuals with leg amputation.

Consciousness and cognition·2026

Same journal

Inhibitory control and mind wandering; more difficult inhibition decreases mind wandering, within limits.

Consciousness and cognition·2026

Same journal

Autism and Aphantasia.

Consciousness and cognition·2026

See all related articles

Determining consciousness of information is complex. This review examines subjective and objective methods in implicit learning research, highlighting significant methodological challenges.

Area of Science:

Cognitive Psychology
Neuroscience
Learning Sciences

Background:

Assessing awareness of information is crucial in cognitive research.
Traditional methods rely on self-report, which can be unreliable.
Implicit learning research specifically faces challenges in measuring conscious awareness.

Purpose of the Study:

To review advancements in subjective and objective methods for assessing awareness in implicit learning.
To critically analyze the methodological complexities associated with these assessment techniques.
To provide insights into the challenges of measuring consciousness in research settings.

Main Methods:

Literature review of recent studies in implicit learning.
Analysis of subjective (e.g., questionnaires, confidence ratings) and objective (e.g., neuroimaging, behavioral measures) methods.

Related Experiment Videos

Discussion of methodological limitations and potential biases.

Main Results:

Subjective measures offer direct insight but are prone to biases and retrospective reconstruction.
Objective measures provide indirect but potentially more robust indicators of awareness.
The interpretation of both subjective and objective data is often confounded by methodological issues.
No single method reliably captures the full spectrum of conscious awareness.

Conclusions:

Accurately assessing conscious awareness in implicit learning remains a significant methodological hurdle.
A multi-method approach combining subjective and objective measures may offer a more comprehensive understanding.
Future research needs to address the inherent complexities and limitations of current assessment techniques.