Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 19, 2026

Rat Model of the Associating Liver Partition and Portal Vein Ligation for Staged Hepatectomy (ALPPS) Procedure
Published on: August 14, 2017
Use of split-liver allografts does not impair pediatric recipient growth
Alejandro Mejia1, Neil Barshes, Glenn Halff
1Transplant Center, University of Texas Health Science Center, San Antonio, TX, USA. alejandromejia@mhd.com
Insights
Split-liver (SL) transplantation offers comparable patient and graft survival to whole organ grafts. Pediatric SL recipients show similar linear growth outcomes to whole-graft recipients, with split grafts even promoting catch-up growth.
Area of Science:
- Pediatric surgery
- Transplantation immunology
- Pediatric gastroenterology
Background:
- Split-liver (SL) allografts are a viable option for pediatric liver transplantation.
- Patient and graft survival rates for SL allografts are comparable to whole organ grafts.
- Limited data exists on the long-term quality of life, specifically growth, in pediatric SL recipients compared to whole-graft recipients.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the linear growth of pediatric liver transplant recipients using split-liver (SL) allografts versus whole-size allografts.
- To evaluate height z scores and catch-up growth in young children post-transplantation.
Main Methods:
- A retrospective analysis of 201 pediatric liver transplants performed between 1995 and 2004 at two institutions.
- Data collection included height, z score, and delta z score for 39 split-graft and 36 whole-size recipients aged 3 years or younger at transplant.
- Statistical analysis of height z scores at 1, 2, and 3 years post-transplant.
Main Results:
- All recipients experienced growth retardation at the time of transplant.
- No statistically significant differences in height z scores were observed between SL and whole-size graft recipients at 1, 2, and 3 years post-transplant (P = 0.65, 0.13, and 0.32, respectively).
- Catch-up growth was observed exclusively in recipients of split grafts.
Conclusions:
- Split-liver transplantation does not significantly impair linear growth in pediatric recipients compared to whole-size grafts.
- SL allografts demonstrate comparable growth outcomes to conventional whole organ grafts.
- The findings suggest that SL transplantation is a safe and effective option for pediatric liver recipients, supporting satisfactory growth trajectories.
Abstract:
The use of split-liver (SL) allografts continues to be an excellent option for many pediatric recipients. Patient and graft survival with this graft type are comparable to patient and graft survival with whole organ grafts. Quality-of-life issues, specifically growth, for SL recipients have not been compared to those of recipients of more conventional whole-organ recipients. Pediatric recipients of SL and whole allografts at 2 institutions were identified. Height, z score, and delta z score were calculated for all recipients for each year after transplant. Between 1995 and 2004, 201 pediatric liver transplants were analyzed. Data were collected on 39 split-graft recipients and 36 whole-size recipients. Only subjects 3 years or younger were included in the study. Growth retardation was present in all recipients at transplant. Height z score post split and whole-size transplant were not statistically different at 1- (P = 0.65), 2- (P = 0.13), and 3-year (P = 0.32) anniversaries, respectively. Catch-up growth was present only in recipients of split grafts. In conclusion, the use of split grafts as opposed to whole-size grafts revealed no significant differences in terms of linear growth. Our report indicates that split-liver transplantation does not impair recipient growth.
Related Concept Videos
Kidney Transplant I: Introduction
Kidney Transplant II: Surgical Procedure

