Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Handling manipulated evidence.

Gianluca Baio1, Fabio Corradi

  • 1University College London, Department of Statistical Science, Gower Street, London WC1E 6BT, UK. gianluca@stats.ucl.ac.uk

Forensic Science International
|October 13, 2006
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Flexible Survival Extrapolation with Blended Hazards: Accounting for Treatment Effect Waning in Health Technology Assessment.

Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making·2026
Same author

Extrapolation of Time-to-Event Survival Outcomes of Histology-Independent Therapies Using a Bayesian Hierarchical Model.

Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making·2026
Same author

Spatio-temporal trends and socio-environmental determinants of suicides in England (2002-2022): an ecological population-based study.

The Lancet regional health. Europe·2026
Same author

Effect modification and non-collapsibility together may lead to conflicting treatment decisions: A review of marginal and conditional estimands and recommendations for decision-making.

Research synthesis methods·2026
Same author

Regression augmented weighting adjustment for indirect comparisons in health decision modelling.

Research synthesis methods·2026
Same author

Bayesian Cost-Effectiveness Analysis Using Individual-Level Data is Sensitive to the Choice of Uniform Priors on the Standard Deviations for Costs in Log-Normal Models.

PharmacoEconomics·2025
Same journal

Technical note: Development of a UHPLC-MS/MS method for the analysis of hCG and IGF-I from dried blood spots: A preliminary study.

Forensic science international·2026
Same journal

A novel and robust deep learning model for sibling firearm matching.

Forensic science international·2026
Same journal

Changes in C-reactive protein levels over time in high-temperature environments using postmortem blood.

Forensic science international·2026
Same journal

Insights from the first synthetic cannabinoid clandestine lab dismantled in Brazil.

Forensic science international·2026
Same journal

Determination of the new psychoactive substances MDMB-4en-PINACA, ADB-BUTINACA and some of their metabolites in blood and urine using DLLE-LC-MS/MS: application to real forensic case samples.

Forensic science international·2026
Same journal

The revolver halo as a forensic marker: Raman spectroscopic evidence of primer-driven gunshot residue deposition.

Forensic science international·2026
See all related articles

This study introduces a new model for Bayesian Networks (BNs) to account for manipulated evidence in criminal investigations. It helps evaluate suspect guilt when evidence might be misleading.

Area of Science:

  • Forensic Science
  • Artificial Intelligence
  • Probability Theory

Background:

  • Bayesian Networks (BNs) are established tools for modeling dependencies in criminal investigations.
  • BNs aid investigators in structuring cases and assessing evidence impact on guilt hypotheses.
  • A limitation exists in handling potentially manipulated evidence designed to mislead investigations.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To develop a novel model for Bayesian Networks capable of addressing manipulated evidence.
  • To enhance the robustness of evidential analysis in criminal cases where evidence tampering is suspected.

Main Methods:

  • The proposed method utilizes principles of causal inference.
  • A specific framework is developed to integrate the possibility of evidence manipulation into BN models.

Related Experiment Videos

  • The model evaluates the impact of potentially misleading evidence on the hypothesis of suspect guilt.

    • Main Results:

    • The model provides a structured approach to analyzing cases with potentially fabricated evidence.
    • It allows for a more accurate assessment of guilt probabilities when evidence integrity is questionable.

    Conclusions:

    • The developed model offers a significant advancement in applying Bayesian Networks to complex criminal investigations.
    • It addresses a critical gap by explicitly modeling the impact of manipulated evidence, improving investigative accuracy.