Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Measuring quality in trauma care.

Cameron D Willis1, Belinda J Gabbe, Peter A Cameron

  • 1Department of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Nursing and Health Sciences, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.

Injury
|October 13, 2006
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Function and Quality of Life 5 Years Following Pediatric Major Trauma: A Population-Based Cohort Study.

Annals of surgery open : perspectives of surgical history, education, and clinical approaches·2026
Same author

Pediatric disability weights following injury based on patient-reported data from a multinational cohort.

European journal of pediatrics·2026
Same author

Strategies for assessing posthospitalisation outcomes in trauma survivors and their feasibility of implementation: a scoping review protocol.

BMJ open·2026
Same author

Impact of mobilization dose on outcome of critically ill patients receiving mechanical ventilation-a target trial emulation using data from the TEAM trial.

American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine·2026
Same author

Health-related quality of life outcomes and recovery trajectories following burn injury.

Burns : journal of the International Society for Burn Injuries·2026
Same author

Outcomes of major trauma patients by hospital level of care in New Zealand.

Injury·2026
Same journal

Cumulative traumatic life events and increased risk for emergency department and inpatient utilization after physical injury hospitalization.

Injury·2026
Same journal

Advances in the management of chest wall injuries - Influence of new technical options.

Injury·2026
Same journal

Trauma nursing as frontline health diplomacy: A binational ATCN program for Palestinian and Israeli nurses during conflict.

Injury·2026
Same journal

Corrigendum to "Neutralizing the odds: Biomechanical protection by adiposity offsets physiological burden to explain the trauma.'obesity-paradox`" [Injury 57 (2) (2026) 112913].

Injury·2026
Same journal

Agreement between ChatGPT and emergency physicians in laceration management: A prospective study.

Injury·2026
Same journal

Lateral epicondylar fractures in the pediatric population: Presentation, management, and outcomes.

Injury·2026
See all related articles

Developing effective quality indicators (QIs) for trauma care presents challenges. This review explores the difficulties in meeting ideal QI criteria and suggests alternative measures for assessing trauma system quality.

Area of Science:

  • Health Services Research
  • Trauma Surgery
  • Quality Improvement

Background:

  • Quality indicators (QIs) are crucial for measuring healthcare performance.
  • Effective QIs require established links to outcomes, adherence to accepted practice, defined populations, risk adjustment, feasibility, and sufficient sample size.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To review the utility of existing quality indicators in trauma care.
  • To highlight challenges in applying ideal QI criteria to trauma patient management.
  • To propose the development of alternative indicators for trauma system quality assessment.

Main Methods:

  • Literature review of quality indicators (QIs) for trauma care.
  • Analysis of proposed QIs by the American College of Surgeons Committee on Trauma (ACSCOT).

Related Experiment Videos

  • Examination of US-based studies investigating QI utility in trauma systems.

    • Main Results:

    • Existing QIs for trauma care face difficulties in meeting all ideal criteria for quality measurement.
    • Some studies support implementing specific QIs, while others recommend discontinuing certain proposed measures.
    • Significant challenges exist in defining target populations and applying risk adjustment strategies in trauma care.

    Conclusions:

    • Meeting ideal quality indicator requirements in trauma care is complex.
    • The development of alternative indicators may offer more practical and useful measures of quality in trauma systems.
    • Further research is needed to refine quality measurement in trauma care.