Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 19, 2026

Screening for Endocrine Activity in Water Using Commercially-available In Vitro Transactivation Bioassays
Published on: December 4, 2016
Biomonitoring equivalents: a screening approach for interpreting biomonitoring results from a public health risk
S M Hays1, R A Becker, H W Leung
1Summit Toxicology, LLP, Allenspark, CO, USA. shays@summittoxicology.com
Abstract:
Advances in both sensitivity and specificity of analytical chemistry have made it possible to quantify substances in human biological specimens, such as blood, urine, and breast milk, in specimen volumes that are practical for collection from individuals. Research laboratories led by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) in its series National Report on Human Exposure to Environmental Chemicals [Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), 2005. Third National Report on Human Exposure to Environmental Chemicals. NCEH Pub. No. 05-0570.] are dedicating substantial resources to designing and conducting human biomonitoring studies and compiling biomonitoring data for the general population. However, the ability to quantitatively interpret the results of human biomonitoring in the context of a health risk assessment currently lags behind the analytical chemist's ability to make such measurements. The traditional paradigm for human health risk assessment of environmental chemicals involves comparing estimated daily doses to health-based criteria for acceptable, safe, or tolerable daily intakes (for example, reference doses [RfDs], tolerable daily intakes [TDIs], or minimal risk levels [MRLs]) to assess whether estimated doses exceed such health screening levels. However, biomonitoring efforts result in measured chemical concentrations in biological specimens (the result of absorption, distribution, metabolism and excretion of administered doses) rather than estimated intake doses. Quantitative benchmarks of acceptable or safe concentrations in biological specimens (analogous to RfDs, TDIs, or MRLs) needed to interpret these levels exist for very few chemicals of environmental interest. This paper discusses issues inherent in converting existing health screening benchmarks based on intake doses to screening levels for evaluating biomonitoring data, and presents methods and approaches that can be used to derive such screening levels (termed "Biomonitoring Equivalents," or BEs) for a range of chemicals and biological media.
More Related Videos
08:14Ecotoxicological Methodologies to Evaluate Biomarkers at Different Scales in Neotropical Anurans
Published on: April 28, 2023
09:33Visualizing Field Data Collection Procedures of Exposure and Biomarker Assessments for the Household Air Pollution Intervention Network Trial in India
Published on: December 23, 2022
Related Concept Videos
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast, controlled...
Bioequivalence Data: Statistical Interpretation
Measurement of Bioavailability: Pharmacodynamic Methods
Bioequivalence of Drugs: Drugs with Multiple Indications
Bioequivalence: Overview
Overview of Biostatistics in Health Sciences