Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 19, 2026

The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies
Published on: August 25, 2023
Why are attributions to discrimination interpersonally costly? A test of system- and group-justifying motivations
Cheryl R Kaiser1, Portia S Dyrenforth, Nao Hagiwara
1Psychology Department, University of Washington Seattle, WA 98195, USA. ckaiser@u.washington.edu.
Abstract:
In two studies, Whites' endorsement of system-justifying beliefs predicted increased negativity toward Blacks who blamed negative events on discrimination. Whites' system-justifying beliefs were not associated with negativity toward Blacks who blamed negative events on other internal causes, external causes, or nondiscriminatory unfairness. These negative reactions toward discrimination claimants were mediated by perceptions that the claimant held dissimilar values and failed to take personal responsibility for outcomes. In both studies, participants' White Identification did not moderate the relationship between the Black target's attribution for failure and subsequent negative perceptions of that individual, thus providing evidence against a group-justification explanation of these findings.
Related Concept Videos
Fundamental Attribution Error
Stereotypes, Prejudice, and Discrimination
Attribution Theory
Attribution
Theory of Attribution II: Kelley's Covariation Theory
Theory of Attribution I: Correspondent Inference Theory

