Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Biological Effects of Radiation

Biological Effects of Radiation

All radioactive nuclides emit high-energy particles or electromagnetic waves. When this radiation encounters living cells, it can cause heating, break chemical bonds, or ionize molecules. The most serious biological damage results when these radioactive emissions fragment or ionize molecules. For example, α and β particles emitted from nuclear decay reactions possess much higher energies than ordinary chemical bond energies. When these particles strike and penetrate matter, they produce ions...

Nuclear Power

Nuclear Power

Controlled nuclear fission reactions are used to generate electricity. Any nuclear reactor that produces power via the fission of uranium or plutonium by bombardment with neutrons has six components: nuclear fuel consisting of fissionable material, a nuclear moderator, a neutron source, control rods, reactor coolant, and a shield and containment system.
Nuclear Fuels
Nuclear fuel consists of a fissile isotope, such as uranium-235, which must be present in sufficient quantity to provide a...

Radioactive Decay and Radiometric Dating

Radioactive Decay and Radiometric Dating

Radioactivity is a spontaneous disintegration of an unstable nuclide and is a random process, as all the nuclei in the sample do not decay simultaneously. The number of disintegrations per unit time is called the activity (A), which is directly proportional to the number of nuclei in the sample. The decay constant (λ) is an average probability of decay per nucleus in unit time.

Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches

Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches

Biopharmaceutical studies constitute a vital field aiming to enhance drug delivery methods and refine therapeutic approaches, drawing upon diverse interdisciplinary knowledge. In research methodologies, the choice between controlled and non-controlled studies significantly influences the study's reliability and accuracy.
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast, controlled...

Isotopes and Radioisotopes

Isotopes and Radioisotopes

In the early 1900s, English chemist Frederick Soddy realized that an element could have atoms with different masses that were chemically indistinguishable. These different types are called isotopes — atoms of the same element that differ in mass. Isotopes differ in mass because they have different numbers of neutrons but are chemically identical because they have the same number of protons. Soddy was awarded the Nobel Prize in Chemistry in 1921 for this discovery.
An isotope containing more...

Types of Radioactivity

Types of Radioactivity

The most common types of radioactivity are α decay, β decay, γ decay, neutron emission, and electron capture.
Alpha (α) decay is the emission of an α particle from the nucleus. For example, polonium-210 undergoes α decay:

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same journal

An Operational Data Management Approach for Helicopter-based Aerial Radiation Measurements in Emergency Preparedness and Response.

Health physics·2026

Same journal

Radiophobia as a Confounding Variable in Low-dose Radiation Epidemiology: Reassessing Cancer Risk Near Nuclear Power Plants.

Health physics·2026

Same journal

Occupational Skin Cancer in Interventional Catheterization Staff: A Scoping Review.

Health physics·2026

Same journal

Suggested Approaches on Communicating to the Public Implications of the Linear No-Threshold (LNT) Dose Response Model and the Fallacy That "There Are No Safe Levels of Radiation Exposure".

Health physics·2026

Same journal

Evaluation of Lung Doses from Radon and Thoron Exposure by Using LR-115 Detectors.

Health physics·2026

Same journal

Radon and Radium Levels in Soil and Associated Indoor and Outdoor Radon Radiation Hazards in the Raparin Area, Sulaymaniyah, Iraqi Kurdistan.

Health physics·2026

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jul 19, 2026

Metabolic Labeling of Leucine Rich Repeat Kinases 1 and 2 with Radioactive Phosphate

Metabolic Labeling of Leucine Rich Repeat Kinases 1 and 2 with Radioactive Phosphate

Published on: September 18, 2013

Risk-informed radioactive waste classification and reclassification.

Allen G Croff¹

¹croff@bellsouth.net

|October 13, 2006

Summary

The current U.S. radioactive waste classification system is not risk-informed, as it prioritizes waste source over inherent risks. A risk-based approach is recommended for safer radioactive waste management and disposal.

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jul 19, 2026

Metabolic Labeling of Leucine Rich Repeat Kinases 1 and 2 with Radioactive Phosphate

Metabolic Labeling of Leucine Rich Repeat Kinases 1 and 2 with Radioactive Phosphate

Published on: September 18, 2013

Area of Science:

Nuclear Engineering
Environmental Science
Risk Assessment

Background:

Radioactive waste classification systems are crucial for safe management, treatment, storage, transport, and disposal.
Current U.S. systems are not fully risk-informed, deviating from recommendations like NCRP Report No. 139.
Classification is often based on waste origin rather than inherent risk characteristics.

Purpose of the Study:

To analyze the current U.S. radioactive waste classification and reclassification system.
To assess the extent to which the system is risk-informed and its implications.
To identify shortcomings and suggest future directions for a risk-informed system.

Main Methods:

Review and analysis of the existing U.S. radioactive waste classification framework.
Evaluation against risk-informed principles, particularly those from NCRP Report No. 139.
Identification of key definitions and management provisions lacking risk-based criteria.

Main Results:

The U.S. system is not risk-informed, with high-level waste definitions based on source, not risk.
Lack of general principles for exempting materials from radioactive waste classification hinders efficient management.
The current system's non-risk-informed nature has significant ramifications for public health and safety.

Conclusions:

The U.S. radioactive waste classification system requires significant revision to become risk-informed.
Adopting a risk-based approach is essential for aligning with modern safety recommendations.
Future efforts should focus on developing principles for risk-based classification and material exemption.