Discontinued drugs in 2005: oncology drugs
1CRT Development Laboratory, Wolfson Institute for Biomedical Research, University College London, The Cruciform Building, Gower Street, London WC1E 6BT, UK. lkelland@cancertechnology.com
Abstract:
This perspective is the second in a series of papers discussing drugs dropped from development in 2005, of which 20 were being developed for cancer. Of these 20, 60% were biological agents and included 3 cancer vaccine (e.g., Canvaxin) and 2 antisense oligonucleotide (e.g., aprinocarsen sodium). Overall, 10 cancer drugs were discontinued in Phase I, 6 in Phase II and 4 at Phase III. This paper surveys drugs discontinued in the oncology arena in 2005 by stage of development and class of compound, suggesting some reasons for their failure.
Insights
In 2005, 20 cancer drugs were discontinued, with 60% being biological agents. This analysis examines reasons for oncology drug failures across development phases.
Area of Science:
- Oncology
- Drug Development
- Pharmaceutical Science
Background:
- In 2005, 20 oncology drugs were discontinued during development.
- Biological agents, including cancer vaccines and antisense oligonucleotides, comprised 60% of these discontinued drugs.
- Discontinuation occurred across all development phases: 10 in Phase I, 6 in Phase II, and 4 in Phase III.
Purpose of the Study:
- To survey drugs discontinued in the oncology field in 2005.
- To analyze these discontinuations by stage of development and compound class.
- To suggest potential reasons for the failure of these oncology drugs.
Main Methods:
- Review of drug development pipelines for 2005.
- Categorization of discontinued oncology drugs by development phase (Phase I, II, III).
- Classification of drugs by compound type (e.g., biological agents, vaccines, oligonucleotides).
Main Results:
- A total of 20 cancer drugs were dropped from development in 2005.
- Ten drugs failed in Phase I, six in Phase II, and four in Phase III.
- Biological agents represented a significant portion of discontinued oncology drugs.
Conclusions:
- The high failure rate of biological agents in oncology drug development warrants further investigation.
- Understanding reasons for early-stage (Phase I) failures is crucial for improving future drug development strategies.
- This analysis provides insights into the challenges of oncology drug development and potential areas for improvement.
Related Concept Videos
FDA Approved Drugs: Changes to Approved Drugs
Treatment Resistent Cancers
Treatment Resistant Cancers
Prescription, Nonprescription and Orphan Drugs
The misuse and addiction to prescription drugs is a growing problem that can affect people of all age groups, specifically teenagers. This can happen when prescription medications are used in ways not intended by the prescriber, such as taking someone else's prescription or using medication for...
Cancer Therapies
However, cancer treatments can pose several challenges, as therapies used to kill cancer cells are generally also toxic to normal cells. Moreover, cancer cells mutate rapidly and can develop resistance to chemical agents or radiation therapy. Besides, all types of cancer cells may not respond to the same therapy. Some cancer cells respond to one...
Cancer Therapies
However, cancer treatments can pose several challenges, as therapies used to kill cancer cells are generally also toxic to normal cells. Moreover, cancer cells mutate rapidly and can develop resistance to chemical agents or radiation therapy. Besides, all types of cancer cells may not respond to the same therapy. Some cancer cells respond to one...
