Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 19, 2026

Anti-Nuclear Antibody Screening Using HEp-2 Cells
Published on: June 23, 2014
Are isolated antinucleolar antibodies a marker of scleroderma?
Meenakshi Jolly1, Mary Smaron, Tammy Olsen Utset
1Section of Rheumatology, Department of Medicine, The University of Chicago Hospitals, Chicago, IL, USA. meenakshijolly@netscape.net
Abstract:
This study was designed to determine the prevalence and positive predictive value of isolated antinucleolar antibody (ANA) in scleroderma patients. We identified 73 rheumatology clinic patients with isolated ANAs. ANA titers greater than 1:160 were considered positive. The overall prevalence of isolated ANAs was 2.9%. The prevalence of isolated ANAs in scleroderma, systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), and rheumatoid arthritis were 20.3%, 2.68%, and 3.3%, respectively. Scleroderma and SLE were present in 12 patients (16.4%) each. Other rheumatologic disorders identified in these patients were RA (12.3%), undifferentiated connective tissue disease (8.2%), mixed connective tissue disease (4.1%), vasculitis (6.8%), fibromyalgia (8.2%), osteoarthritis (5.4%), crystal-related arthropathy (6.8%), seronegative arthritis (2.7%), sarcoidosis (4.1%), and others (8.2%). There were no statistically significant differences in the median ANA titers in scleroderma versus systemic lupus (P = 0.16) or undifferentiated connective tissue disease (P = 0.18). The median titers were higher in scleroderma in comparison with rheumatoid arthritis (P = 0.01), osteoarthritis (P = 0.007), fibromyalgia (P = 0.001), and crystal-related arthropathy (P = 0.009). Isolated ANAs have poor sensitivity (20.3%) and the positive predictive value for this test is only 16.4% for scleroderma.
More Related Videos
10:05Simultaneous Distinction of Monospecific and Mixed DFS70 Patterns During ANA Screening with a Novel HEp-2 ELITE/DFS70 Knockout Substrate
Published on: January 17, 2018
09:43Analyses of Proteinuria, Renal Infiltration of Leukocytes, and Renal Deposition of Proteins in Lupus-prone MRL/lpr Mice
Published on: June 8, 2022