Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 19, 2026

Neuronavigation and Laparoscopy Guided Ventriculoperitoneal Shunt Insertion for the Treatment of Hydrocephalus
Published on: October 14, 2022
Outcome prediction of third ventriculostomy: a proposed hydrocephalus grading system
U Kehler1, J Regelsberger, J Gliemroth
1Neurosurgical Department, Asklepios Clinic Altona, Hamburg, Germany. uwe.kehler@ak-altona.lbk-hh.de
Insights
A new grading system predicts endoscopic third ventriculostomy (3rd VS) success in hydrocephalus patients. This system, based on MRI and clinical signs, aids in choosing between 3rd VS and VP shunting for better outcomes.
Area of Science:
- Neurosurgery
- Neurology
- Medical Imaging
Background:
- Hydrocephalus treatment decisions (VP shunt vs. endoscopic third ventriculostomy [3rd VS]) depend on underlying pathology and prognosis.
- Endoscopic third ventriculostomy is primarily successful in obstructive hydrocephalus but also in some communicating subtypes.
- A predictive grading system for 3rd VS outcomes is needed to guide surgical recommendations.
Purpose of the Study:
- To propose a simple, applicable grading system for hydrocephalus to predict the outcome of endoscopic third ventriculostomy (3rd VS).
- To correlate grading system results with the success rates of 3rd VS in a retrospective patient cohort.
Main Methods:
- A grading system was developed based on MRI findings (downward bulging of the third ventricle floor, CSF pathway obstruction) and clinical symptom progression.
- Hydrocephalus was classified into five grades (1-5) based on these parameters.
- The system was retrospectively applied to 72 patients who underwent 3rd VS.
Main Results:
- Grade 1 showed no downward bulging, no obstruction, and no progressive symptoms, indicating no indication for 3rd VS.
- Grades 2-4 presented varying combinations of the assessed parameters.
- Grade 5, characterized by marked downward bulging, confirmed CSF pathway obstruction (e.g., aqueductal stenosis), and progressive symptoms, showed a 95% success rate for 3rd VS. Success rates for grades 3 and 4 were 40% and 58%, respectively.
Conclusions:
- The proposed standardized grading system accurately predicts the outcome of endoscopic third ventriculostomy (3rd VS).
- This system aids neurosurgeons in making informed decisions between 3rd VS and ventriculoperitoneal (VP) shunting for hydrocephalus management.
Abstract:
An important factor in making a recommendation for different treatment modalities in hydrocephalus patients (VP shunt versus endoscopic third ventriculostomy) is the definition of the underlying pathology which determines the prognosis/outcome of the surgical procedure. Third ventriculostomies (3rd VS) are successful mainly in obstructive hydrocephalus but also in some subtypes of communicating hydrocephalus. A simple, easily applicable grading system that is designed to predict the outcome of 3rd VS is proposed. The hydrocephalus is graded on the basis of the extent of downward bulging of the floor of the third ventricle, which reflects the pressure gradient between the 3rd ventricle and the basal cisterns, presence of directly visualised CSF pathway obstruction in MRI, and the progression of the clinical symptoms resulting in five different grades. In this proposed grading system, grade 1 hydrocephalus subtype shows no downward bulged floor of the 3rd ventricle, no obstruction of the CSF pathway, and no progressive symptoms of hydrocephalus. There is no indication for 3rd VS. Grades 2 to 4 show different combinations of the described parameters. Grade 5 subtype shows a markedly downward bulged floor of the 3rd ventricle and direct detection of the CSF pathway obstruction (i.e., aqueductal stenosis) with progressive clinical deterioration. Retrospective application of this grading scheme to a series of 72 3rd VS has demonstrated a high correlation with the outcome: The success rate in grade 3 reached 40%, in grade 4: 58%, and in grade 5: 95%. This standardised grading system predicts the outcome of 3rd VS and helps in decision making for 3rd VS versus VP shunting.
Related Concept Videos
Increased Intracranial Pressure l: Introduction
Heart Failure IV: Classification and Diagnostic Evaluation
Cerebral Edema ll: Pathophysiology
Increased Intracranial Pressure ll: Pathophysiology
Aneurysm IV: Nursing Management
Cerebral Edema l: Introduction
