Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Reliability and Validity01:29

Reliability and Validity

Reliability and validity are two important considerations that must be made with any type of data collection. Reliability refers to the ability to consistently produce a given result. In the context of psychological research, this would mean that any instruments or tools used to collect data do so in consistent, reproducible ways.
Cross-Sectional Research01:50

Cross-Sectional Research

In cross-sectional research, a researcher compares multiple segments of the population at the same time. If they were interested in people's dietary habits, the researcher might directly compare different groups of people by age. Instead of following a group of people for 20 years to see how their dietary habits changed from decade to decade, the researcher would study a group of 20-year-old individuals and compare them to a group of 30-year-old individuals and a group of 40-year-old...
Correlations02:20

Correlations

Correlation means that there is a relationship between two or more variables (such as ice cream consumption and crime), but this relationship does not necessarily imply cause and effect. When two variables are correlated, it simply means that as one variable changes, so does the other. We can measure correlation by calculating a statistic known as a correlation coefficient. A correlation coefficient is a number from -1 to +1 that indicates the strength and direction of the relationship between...
Relationship Formation02:12

Relationship Formation

What do you think is the single most influential factor in determining with whom you become friends and whom you form romantic relationships? You might be surprised to learn that the answer is simple: the people with whom you have the most contact. This most important factor is proximity. You are more likely to be friends with people you have regular contact with. For example, there are decades of research that shows that you are more likely to become friends with people who live in your dorm,...
Correlation01:09

Correlation

In statistics, two variables are said to be correlated if the values of one variable are associated with the other variable. Depending on the relationship between two variables, correlation can be of three types– positive correlation, negative correlation, and zero correlation.
Two variables, for example, a and b, are said to be positively correlated if both variables move in the same direction. In other words, a positive correlation exists between two variables, a and b, if:
Factors Influencing Attraction III: Similarity01:23

Factors Influencing Attraction III: Similarity

The similarity hypothesis suggests that individuals are more likely to form relationships with others who share similar attitudes, beliefs, values, and interests. This concept has been widely studied in social psychology, demonstrating that perceived similarity fosters interpersonal attraction. In an experiment supporting this hypothesis, participants were presented with fabricated information indicating that strangers held attitudes similar to their own. The results showed that participants...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same journal

War and Terrorism Perceptions a Decade Later: Target Distinction or Ethnic-Cultural Bias?

The Journal of social psychology·2026
Same journal

You Must Eat Less Meat! Effects of Issue Importance on Reactance to Meat-Reduction Messages.

The Journal of social psychology·2026
Same journal

The Dynamics of Distributed Leadership and Organizational Citizenship Behavior in Healthcare: Moderated Mediation of Psychological Capital and Emotional Exhaustion.

The Journal of social psychology·2026
Same journal

Threat-Induced Conservatism in a Liberal Electorate: Issue-Based Shifts without Ideological Transformation.

The Journal of social psychology·2026
Same journal

Exploring schadenfreude from the perspectives of deservingness and terror management theories.

The Journal of social psychology·2026
Same journal

The Impact of Shame, Humiliation and Pride on Revenge Desire and Behavior in Victims of Crime: A Pilot Experimental Study.

The Journal of social psychology·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jul 19, 2026

Functional Near-Infrared Spectroscopy Hyperscanning Study in Psychological Counseling
06:04

Functional Near-Infrared Spectroscopy Hyperscanning Study in Psychological Counseling

Published on: January 17, 2025

Correlates of minimal dating.

Kira Leck1

  • 1Department of Psychology, University of Pittsburgh at Bradford Campus, Bradford, PA 16710, USA. KML2@EXCHANGE.UPB.PITT.EDU

The Journal of Social Psychology
|October 18, 2006
PubMed
Summary

This study explored factors linked to minimal dating in college students. Findings suggest minimal dating may not be a single concept, with different factors influencing it in men and women.

Area of Science:

  • Psychology
  • Social Psychology
  • Human Behavior

Background:

  • Minimal dating is a phenomenon studied in relation to various psychological and social factors.
  • Previous research has often treated minimal dating as a singular construct.
  • Understanding the correlates of minimal dating is crucial for social and relationship research.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the relationships between shyness, introversion, physical attractiveness, anxiety, social skill, self-esteem, and loneliness with minimal dating.
  • To examine these relationships separately for men and women.
  • To assess whether minimal dating is a unidimensional construct.

Main Methods:

  • A sample of 175 college students participated in the study.
  • Two self-report measures of minimal dating were used.

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jul 19, 2026

Functional Near-Infrared Spectroscopy Hyperscanning Study in Psychological Counseling
06:04

Functional Near-Infrared Spectroscopy Hyperscanning Study in Psychological Counseling

Published on: January 17, 2025

  • Correlational analyses were conducted to examine relationships between various psychological factors and minimal dating.

    • Main Results:

    • For women, shyness, introversion, physical attractiveness, self-rated anxiety, social self-esteem, and loneliness were associated with minimal dating.
    • For men, physical attractiveness, observer-rated social skill, social self-esteem, and loneliness were associated with minimal dating.
    • The patterns of correlations differed between men and women and between the two minimal dating measures.

    Conclusions:

    • The findings suggest that minimal dating may be a multidimensional construct rather than a single entity.
    • Different factors are associated with minimal dating in men and women.
    • Future research should consider the multifaceted nature of minimal dating.