Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 19, 2026

Measuring Attentional Biases for Threat in Children and Adults
Published on: October 19, 2014
Skin conductance responses to masked conditioned stimuli: phylogenetic/ontogenetic factors versus direction of
Anders Flykt1, Francisco Esteves, Arne Ohman
1Psychology Section, Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden. Anders.Flykt@kau.se
Abstract:
Evolutionarily old threat stimuli are likely to require less conscious information processing than threat stimuli of a more recent date. To test this proposal two differential conditioning experiments, with biological threat stimuli (e.g. snakes) in half the groups and cultural threat stimuli (e.g. guns) in the other half, were conducted. The conditioned (CS+) and the control (CS-) stimuli were backward masked during the extinction phase to prevent conscious recognition. The differential skin conductance responding for both biological and cultural threat stimuli survived the masking procedure when the conditioned stimuli were directed towards the participants (Experiment 1), but for neither type of CS when stimuli were not directed towards the participants (Experiment 2). These findings are discussed in relation to the previous finding by Ohman and co-workers and in relation to imminence of threat.
Related Concept Videos
Preparedness and Phobias
Causes of Social Behavior III: Biological and Environmental Influences
Facial Feedback Hypothesis
Physiological Theories: Cannon-Bard Theory of Emotion
Upon perceiving a stimulus, such as a dangerous...
Physiological Theories: James-Lange Theory of Emotion
