Parallel changes in metabolite and expression profiles in crooked-tail mutant and folate-reduced wild-type mice

Sheila Ernest1, Michelle Carter, Haifeng Shao

  • 1Department of Genetics, Center for Computational Genomics, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, OH 44106, USA.

Human Molecular Genetics
|October 20, 2006
PubMed

Insights

Dietary folate supplementation helps some birth defects but not all. This study identified metabolite and expression profiles that can predict folate responsiveness in neural tube defects (NTDs).

Area of Science:

  • Biochemistry
  • Genetics
  • Developmental Biology

Background:

  • Anomalies in homocysteine (HCY) and folate metabolism are linked to birth defects and adult diseases.
  • Dietary folate supplementation can reduce neural tube defects (NTDs), but many cases show resistance.
  • The reasons for variable folate response and predictive biomarkers remain unknown.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To identify diagnostic features for responsiveness versus resistance to dietary folate supplementation.
  • To investigate the mechanism by which folate supplementation suppresses NTDs in Crooked-tail (Cd) mutant mice.
  • To develop predictive biomarkers for folate responsiveness in NTDs.

Main Methods:

  • Surveyed metabolite and expression levels in liver samples from Cd mutant and wild-type mice on varied diets (supplemented, reduced, control).
  • Analyzed homocysteine (tHcy) levels in Cd homozygotes.
  • Combined expression and metabolite profiles with published data to cluster models based on folate responsiveness.

Main Results:

  • Cd homozygotes had normal total homocysteine (tHcy) levels, indicating folate's NTD suppression mechanism doesn't rely on modulating serum tHcy.
  • Parallel changes in metabolite and expression profiles suggest Crooked-tail homozygotes have an intracellular folate utilization defect.
  • Two distinct clusters emerged: folate-responsive NTD models and presumed folate-resistant models.
  • Ski-/- mutant mice, predicted to be folate-resistant, showed no NTD suppression with folate supplementation.

Conclusions:

  • Metabolite and expression profiles can distinguish between folate-responsive and folate-resistant NTD models.
  • These profiles may help identify at-risk pregnancies and guide folate supplementation strategies.
  • Intracellular folate utilization, rather than serum tHcy levels, may be a key factor in folate responsiveness for NTDs.

Related Concept Videos