Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Pain processing is faster than tactile processing in the human brain.

Markus Ploner1, Joachim Gross, Lars Timmermann

  • 1Department of Neurology, Heinrich-Heine-University, D-40225 Düsseldorf, Germany. ploner@neurologie.uni-duesseldorf.de

The Journal of Neuroscience : the Official Journal of the Society for Neuroscience
|October 20, 2006
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Varying patterns of association between cortical large-scale networks and subthalamic nucleus activity in Parkinson's disease.

NPJ Parkinson's disease·2026
Same author

The deep brain stimulation response network in Parkinson's disease operates in the high beta band.

Brain : a journal of neurology·2026
Same author

Effect of deep brain stimulation on dysphagia in Parkinson's disease: mechanisms, evidence, and outlook.

Frontiers in aging neuroscience·2026
Same author

Spatial signature of low-frequency network changes accounts for pallidal stimulation outcome in cervical dystonia.

EBioMedicine·2026
Same author

Quantity and quality of care and staff knowledge regarding people with Parkinson's disease in long-term nursing care: "real-life" results from the German Care4PD study.

Frontiers in aging neuroscience·2026
Same author

Real-world multicenter assessment of sustained clinical outcomes after digital deep brain stimulation.

NPJ digital medicine·2026

Pain processing in the brain is faster than for touch, compensating for slow nerve signals. This rapid cerebral response enhances protective motor reactions to harmful stimuli.

Area of Science:

  • Neuroscience
  • Pain Perception
  • Sensory Processing

Background:

  • Pain perception relies on rapid stimulus-response, yet pain signals travel slower than tactile information.
  • Cerebral processing and reaction times for pain versus touch are not fully understood.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate and compare cerebral processing and reaction times for nociceptive (pain) versus tactile stimuli.
  • To determine if the brain compensates for slower peripheral pain signal conduction.

Main Methods:

  • Utilized selective nociceptive cutaneous laser stimuli.
  • Employed magnetoencephalography (MEG) to measure cortical responses and reaction times.

Main Results:

  • Reaction times to laser-induced pain stimuli were faster than predicted by peripheral conduction velocities.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Cerebral processing latencies were ~60 ms shorter for nociceptive stimuli compared to tactile stimuli.
  • Brain processing of pain is significantly faster than that of tactile information.

    • Conclusions:

    • The brain's rapid processing of pain compensates for slow peripheral and spinal conduction.
    • Enhanced cerebral processing of pain optimizes motor responses to potentially harmful stimuli.
    • This highlights the brain's adaptive organization for managing threat detection and behavioral responses.