Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 19, 2026

12:34
Collection, Isolation, and Flow Cytometric Analysis of Human Endocervical Samples
Published on: July 6, 2014
Keeping collecting device in liquid medium is mandatory to ensure optimized liquid-based cervical cytologic sampling
Gilbert Bigras1, Malgorzata Anna Rieder, Jean-marc Lambercy
1Laboratoire Cytopath (Unilabs SA), Carouge (Genève), Switzerland. gbigras@unilabs.ch
Journal of Lower Genital Tract Disease
|October 20, 2006
Summary
Discarding the cervical scrape collecting device in liquid-based cytology leads to significant cellular material loss, potentially impacting cervical cancer detection. This practice mirrors conventional smear flaws and requires further investigation.
Area of Science:
- Cytopathology
- Cervical Cancer Screening
Background:
- Liquid-based cytology (LBC) is a widely used method for cervical cancer screening.
- Proper sample handling is crucial for accurate cytopathological analysis.
Purpose of the Study:
- To quantify cellular material loss when the collecting device is discarded in LBC.
- To assess the impact of discarding the device on the endocervical component in cervical samples.
Main Methods:
- Cervical scrapes were divided into two subsamples: one rinsed from the device, the other the device discarded.
- Material loss was quantified, and homogeneity of the endocervical component was assessed.
- A two-way analysis of variance was used to analyze loss based on gynecologist and rinsing rotations.
Main Results:
- Approximately 37% of cellular material was lost when the collecting device was discarded.
- Material loss varied among gynecologists and was influenced by rinsing intensity, though never fully eliminated.
- Discarded subsamples frequently contained a higher proportion of endocervical clusters.
Conclusions:
- Discarding the collecting device in LBC introduces significant cellular material loss, similar to conventional smears.
- This loss of cellular material may compromise the accuracy of cervical cancer detection.
- Further research is needed to evaluate the clinical implications of this material loss on cancer detection rates.

