Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Updating representations of learned scenes.

Cory A Finlay1, Michael A Motes, Maria Kozhevnikov

  • 1Department of Psychology, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, Newark, NJ, USA.

Psychological Research
|October 20, 2006
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Reductions in posttraumatic stress disorder re-experiencing frequency from repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation combined with Cognitive Processing Therapy.

International review of psychiatry (Abingdon, England)·2026
Same author

Action-guilt, survivor-guilt, and depression in combat-related PTSD.

PloS one·2026
Same author

Distinct Neural Dynamics of Spatial Transformations: Egocentric Perspective-Taking and Allocentric Rotation.

Brain sciences·2026
Same author

Sex differences in the development of object imagery abilities across age groups.

Scientific reports·2026
Same author

Effect of cue distinctiveness on naming: Evidence from a verbally cued naming paradigm.

Cognitive neuropsychology·2025
Same author

The Contribution of Internal and External Factors to Human Spatial Navigation.

Brain sciences·2024

Investigating spatial updating, this study found that observer movement did not automatically update mental representations of scenes. Reaction times increased with angular distance, regardless of movement type or delay, impacting scene recognition accuracy.

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Neuroscience
  • Spatial Cognition

Background:

  • Understanding how the brain updates spatial representations during movement is crucial for cognitive science.
  • Previous research suggests automatic spatial updating, but its reliability during scene navigation is debated.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare scene recognition reaction time (RT) and accuracy following observer versus scene movement.
  • To investigate the impact of angular distance and temporal delay on spatial updating of scene representations.

Main Methods:

  • Two experiments were conducted involving scene memorization and subsequent observer or scene movement.
  • Participants judged object position changes after viewing scenes from different perspectives.
  • Temporal delays (0, 6, 12 s) were introduced between encoding and movement in the second experiment.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • Reaction time (RT) increased with greater angular distance between encoded and viewed perspectives, irrespective of observer or scene movement.
  • Accuracy decreased as angular distance increased, regardless of the delay between scene encoding and movement.

Conclusions:

  • Observer movement does not consistently update spatial layout representations.
  • The findings question the automaticity of spatial updating and highlight the influence of encoding viewpoint and temporal limitations.