Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Pelvic floor reconstructive surgery: which aspects remain controversial?

Franca Natale1, Jennifer M Weir, Mauro Cervigni

  • 1Department of Urogynecology, University Tor Vergata, San Carlo-IDI Hospital, via Aurelia 275, 00165 Rome, Italy.

Current Opinion in Urology
|October 21, 2006
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Optimizing the Diagnosis of Interstitial Cystitis/Bladder Pain Syndrome: An ESSIC Proposal.

European urology open science·2026
Same author

Transurethral Injection of Autologous Micronized Adipose Tissue for Refractory Interstitial Cystitis/Bladder Pain Syndrome: A Retrospective Pilot Study.

Biomedicines·2026
Same author

Physical activity after single incision sling for stress urinary incontinence: Our experience.

Urologia·2026
Same author

Validation of the Italian Version of the O'Leary-Sant Questionnaire for Patients with Bladder Pain Syndrome/Interstitial Cystitis.

International urogynecology journal·2025
Same author

Role of Gynecologic Findings in Interstitial Cystitis/Bladder Pain Syndrome: A Consensus.

Neurourology and urodynamics·2025
Same author

Treatment of Genitourinary Syndrome of Menopause in Breast Cancer and Gynecologic Cancer Survivors: Retrospective Analysis of Efficacy and Safety of Vaginal Estriol, Vaginal Dehydroepiandrosterone and Ospemifene.

Journal of menopausal medicine·2025

Pelvic reconstructive surgery has controversial areas, including stress urinary incontinence treatment and prosthetic material use. New transvaginal techniques show promise, but high recurrence rates necessitate further research.

Area of Science:

  • Urogynecology
  • Pelvic Floor Disorders
  • Reconstructive Surgery

Background:

  • Pelvic reconstructive surgery addresses complex conditions affecting women's health.
  • Controversies persist regarding optimal surgical techniques and materials.
  • Standardization of outcomes remains a challenge in the field.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To review recent literature on controversial aspects of pelvic reconstructive surgery.
  • To highlight key findings from original and review papers published in the last 12 months.
  • To discuss the implications of the International Consultation on Incontinence findings.

Main Methods:

  • A comprehensive Medline search was conducted for relevant publications.
  • The review focused on papers published within the preceding 12 months.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Specific attention was given to controversial areas with recent publications.

    • Main Results:

    • Recent work addresses prophylactic treatment for stress urinary incontinence.
    • The use of prosthetic materials, especially for anterior segment reconstruction, is a key area of debate.
    • Laparoscopic surgery and transvaginal approaches are also discussed.
    • Uterine preservation in uterovaginal prolapse surgery yielded no significant new data.

    Conclusions:

    • The transvaginal approach is considered most promising, with ongoing technique evolution.
    • High recurrence rates, particularly for anterior wall prolapse, remain a concern.
    • There is a critical need for multicenter, prospective, randomized trials (Level I evidence).
    • Further evidence is required to determine the optimal use of prosthetic materials and methods.