Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Variability of estimated binding parameters.

J Boiden Pedersen1, O Knudsen

  • 1Fysisk Institut, Odense Universitet, DK-5230 Odense M, Denmark.

Biophysical Chemistry
|July 1, 1990
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Multiscale description of avian migration: from chemical compass to behaviour modeling.

Scientific reports·2016
Same author

Zherlock: an open source data analysis software.

SAR and QSAR in environmental research·2004
Same author

Incidence of cancer among welders of mild steel and other shipyard workers.

British journal of industrial medicine·1993
Same author

Pharmacokinetic profile of indoprofen in elderly subjects.

British journal of clinical pharmacology·1986
Same author

[Simultaneous occurrence of Trichomonas vaginalis and gonorrhea in women].

Ugeskrift for laeger·1985
Same author

Progesterone, prostaglandin F-2 alpha, PMSG and oestrone sulphate during early pregnancy in the mare.

Journal of reproduction and fertility. Supplement·1982
Same journal

Machine learning-driven identification of pan-PI3K inhibitors: A hybrid virtual screening approach combining naïve Bayesian classification, pharmacophore modeling, and consensus scoring-based molecular docking.

Biophysical chemistry·2026
Same journal

Optimizing grid preparation methods for TEM imaging of amyloid-forming proteins.

Biophysical chemistry·2026
Same journal

Biogenic reduction mechanisms in iron oxide nanoparticle synthesis: Strategies to mitigate microbial resistance.

Biophysical chemistry·2026
Same journal

Novel Pennisetum Alopecuroides-derived activated carbon for high-efficiency Tartrazine Removal: Box-Behnken optimization and DFT-assisted mechanistic insights.

Biophysical chemistry·2026
Same journal

Reactive molecular dynamics investigation of the first steps of coronavirus (COVID-19) viral-protein ligands fragment (SARS-CoV-2).

Biophysical chemistry·2026
Same journal

Probing the interactions between bovine hemoglobin and three berberine saturated fatty acid salts by multi-spectral techniques, conductimetry and molecular docking.

Biophysical chemistry·2026
See all related articles

This study introduces a new method to calculate the distribution of binding parameter values, moving beyond standard deviation assumptions. This approach enhances experimental design for greater accuracy in scientific research.

Area of Science:

  • Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics
  • Biophysical Chemistry
  • Computational Biology

Background:

  • Standard deviation assumes normal distribution for binding parameters, which may not always be accurate.
  • Accurate estimation of binding parameters is crucial for understanding molecular interactions and drug efficacy.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To present a novel, easily applicable method for calculating the true distribution of acceptable binding parameter values.
  • To provide a robust alternative to standard deviation for assessing parameter reliability.
  • To aid in the practical design of experiments for optimal data acquisition.

Main Methods:

  • Developed a computational method to derive the distribution of binding parameter values directly from experimental data and a chosen binding model.

Related Experiment Videos

  • The method is applicable to both linear and non-linear binding models.
  • Validated the robustness and accuracy of the developed approach.

    • Main Results:

    • Demonstrated that the distribution of binding parameters can be calculated easily, irrespective of model complexity.
    • Showcased the method's ability to investigate the impact of experimental error magnitude and data point distribution on parameter variability.
    • Confirmed the method's accuracy and robustness across different scenarios.

    Conclusions:

    • The presented method offers a more accurate assessment of binding parameter reliability than standard deviation.
    • This approach facilitates informed experimental design, optimizing the number and range of concentrations for desired accuracy.
    • The technique is broadly applicable to various binding models and experimental data sets.