Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Precession electron diffraction 1: multislice simulation.

C S Own1, L D Marks, W Sinkler

  • 1Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL 60208, USA. csown@northwestern.edu

Acta Crystallographica. Section A, Foundations of Crystallography
|October 24, 2006
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Flexoelectricity, Triboelectricity, and Free Interfacial Charges.

Small (Weinheim an der Bergstrasse, Germany)·2024
Same author

Predictive Mixing for Density Functional Theory (and Other Fixed-Point Problems).

Journal of chemical theory and computation·2021
Same author

Does Flexoelectricity Drive Triboelectricity?

Physical review letters·2019
Same author

Direct Observation of "Pac-Man" Coarsening.

Nano letters·2017
Same author

Transition from Reconstruction toward Thin Film on the (110) Surface of Strontium Titanate.

Nano letters·2016
Same author

Nanoparticle shape, thermodynamics and kinetics.

Journal of physics. Condensed matter : an Institute of Physics journal·2016
Same journal

Report of the Executive Committee for 2006.

Acta crystallographica. Section A, Foundations of crystallography·2020
Same journal

Spin line groups.

Acta crystallographica. Section A, Foundations of crystallography·2013
Same journal

Distribution rules of systematic absences on the Conway topograph and their application to powder auto-indexing.

Acta crystallographica. Section A, Foundations of crystallography·2013
Same journal

Platonic solids generate their four-dimensional analogues.

Acta crystallographica. Section A, Foundations of crystallography·2013
Same journal

C70, C80, C90 and carbon nanotubes by breaking of the icosahedral symmetry of C60.

Acta crystallographica. Section A, Foundations of crystallography·2013
Same journal

Comparative study of X-ray charge-density data on CoSb3.

Acta crystallographica. Section A, Foundations of crystallography·2013
See all related articles

Precession electron diffraction (PED) reduces dynamical effects in electron microscopy, simplifying structure determination. This study characterizes PED data to optimize experimental conditions for accurate structural analysis.

Area of Science:

  • Materials Science
  • Crystallography
  • Electron Microscopy

Background:

  • Dynamical effects in electron diffraction complicate crystal structure determination.
  • Precession electron diffraction (PED) offers a method to minimize these dynamical effects.
  • Understanding how experimental parameters influence PED data is crucial for its effective application.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To characterize precession electron diffraction (PED) data.
  • To understand the impact of experimental parameters on PED data quality.
  • To establish optimal conditions for structure solution using PED.

Main Methods:

  • Development and testing of a multislice method for simulating PED data.
  • Analysis of simulated PED data across various experimental parameters.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Comparison of simulated data with experimental data from (Ga,In)(2)SnO(4) (GITO) and ZSM-5 zeolite (MFI).

    • Main Results:

    • Simulated PED data exhibit unipolar intensity deviations, unlike the bipolar deviations in dynamical diffraction data.
    • PED data become more kinematical at smaller specimen thicknesses.
    • Increasing the precession cone semi-angle (phi) minimizes deviations as thickness increases.
    • PED data demonstrate reduced sensitivity to specimen thickness variations compared to conventional methods.

    Conclusions:

    • PED data are more robust against thickness variations, simplifying structure determination.
    • The study provides insights into optimizing experimental parameters for PED.
    • PED is a valuable technique for accurate crystal structure analysis using transmission electron microscopy.