Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 19, 2026

10:49
Visualizing Efficacy of Pesticides Against Disease Vector Mosquitoes in the Field
Published on: March 16, 2019
GIS and multiple-criteria evaluation for the optimisation of tsetse fly eradication programmes
Elias Symeonakis1, Tim Robinson, Nick Drake
1CSIRO Mathematical and Information Sciences, Private Bag 5, Wembley 6913, Western Australia, Australia. elias.symeonakis@csiro.au
Environmental Monitoring and Assessment
|October 24, 2006
Summary
Tsetse fly control in Africa can boost livestock farming but risks environmental damage. This study uses GIS and decision support to identify optimal control areas, promoting integrated disease management for economic viability.
Area of Science:
- Veterinary Entomology
- Environmental Management
- Geographic Information Systems
Background:
- Tsetse flies transmit trypanosomiasis, a disease impacting livestock and human populations across Africa.
- Tsetse fly control offers potential economic benefits through expanded livestock-keeping but poses environmental risks like habitat degradation and biodiversity loss.
- Integrated pest management strategies are crucial to balance disease control with ecological sustainability.
Purpose of the Study:
- To develop a decision support system integrating remote sensing and environmental data for effective tsetse fly control programming.
- To identify priority areas for tsetse control in Zambia, mitigating potential negative environmental consequences.
- To demonstrate the economic viability of integrated disease control over localized eradication efforts.
Main Methods:
- Development of a tree-based decision-support approach combined with Multiple-Criteria Evaluation (MCE).
- Utilisation of a Geographical Information System (GIS) to spatially analyse environmental data and target control efforts.
- Integration of remotely sensed data with other environmental variables for comprehensive risk and priority assessment.
Main Results:
- Clear differentiation of priority areas for tsetse control was achieved under various hypothetical scenarios.
- Specific regions, such as northwest of Petauke in Zambia's Eastern Province, were consistently identified as high-priority control zones.
- Analysis indicated that priority areas are not isolated, supporting the feasibility of integrated, rather than localized, control strategies.
Conclusions:
- A GIS-based decision support system effectively identifies optimal areas for tsetse control, balancing disease management with environmental considerations.
- Integrated tsetse control programs are likely more economically sustainable than eradication efforts, especially when targeting non-isolated populations.
- This methodology provides a framework for informed decision-making in tsetse control, minimizing adverse environmental impacts and maximizing socio-economic benefits.

