Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

The brain, aggression, and public policy.

Robert H Blank1

  • 1Division of Social Sciences, New College of Florida, 5700 North Tamiami Trail, Sarasota, FL 34243-2197. rblank24601@hotmail.com.

Politics and the Life Sciences : the Journal of the Association for Politics and the Life Sciences
|October 25, 2006
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Alzheimer's Disease - Perspective from Political Science: Public Policy Issues.

The Journal of law, medicine & ethics : a journal of the American Society of Law, Medicine & Ethics·2018
Same author

Health Expenditure Growth under Single-Payer Systems: Comparing South Korea and Taiwan.

Value in health regional issues·2018
Same author

Medication supply, healthcare outcomes and healthcare expenses: longitudinal analyses of patients with type 2 diabetes and hypertension.

Health policy (Amsterdam, Netherlands)·2014
Same author

Review of Jean-Pierre Changeux and Paul Ricoeur. 2000. What Makes Us Think? A Neuroscientist and Philosopher Argue about Ethics, Human Nature, and the Brain.

The American journal of bioethics : AJOB·2012
Same author

Biopolicy after three decades.

Politics and the life sciences : the journal of the Association for Politics and the Life Sciences·2011
Same author

End-of-life decision making across cultures.

The Journal of law, medicine & ethics : a journal of the American Society of Law, Medicine & Ethics·2011

Neuroscience advances challenge ethical consensus and public policy, particularly concerning aggression. These implications may be significantly underestimated, requiring urgent policy adaptation.

Area of Science:

  • Neuroscience
  • Ethics
  • Public Policy

Background:

  • Neuroscience research is rapidly advancing, presenting complex ethical and legal challenges.
  • Existing frameworks for research ethics, clinical ethics, legal ethics, and jurisprudence are strained by these developments.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To review recent advances in neurosciences.
  • To examine the potential impact of these advances on various policies.
  • To highlight the underestimated implications, especially concerning aggression.

Main Methods:

  • Literature review of investigational, conceptual, and interventional neuroscience advances.
  • Analysis of the ethical and legal implications of these advances.
  • Policy impact assessment.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • Neuroscience innovations challenge current ethical and legal consensus.
  • Significant policy adaptations are necessary to address these challenges.
  • The impact on policies related to aggression is particularly profound and underestimated.

Conclusions:

  • Neuroscience progress necessitates a reevaluation of ethical guidelines and legal frameworks.
  • Proactive adaptation of public policy is crucial to manage the societal impact of neuroscience.
  • Underestimation of implications, especially regarding aggression, poses a significant risk.