Related Experiment Videos
Evidence-based guidelines, time-based health outcomes, and the Matthew effect
Marie-Louise Essink-Bot1, Michelle E Kruijshaar, Jan J Barendregt
1Department of Public Health, Erasmus MC/University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands. M.ESSINK-BOT@ERASMUSMC.NL
Health economists face a dilemma: prioritize preventing deaths in high-risk individuals or maximizing life years gained in younger populations. Both approaches have different outcomes and moral implications in cardiovascular risk management.
Area of Science:
- Epidemiology
- Health Economics
- Medical Ethics
Background:
- Current cardiovascular risk management guidelines use a 'risk-based' approach, targeting high-risk individuals like the elderly and smokers to prevent deaths.
- Health economists often employ a 'time-based' allocation model, prioritizing younger, non-smoker populations to maximize life years gained.
- These differing allocation models present practical and ethical challenges in resource distribution for preventive cardiovascular drugs.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the distributional effects and outcomes of risk-based versus time-based allocation of a hypothetical cardiovascular drug (CVStop).
- To explore the practical consequences of these two distinct resource allocation strategies in cardiovascular risk management.
- To gauge the preferences of guideline developers when faced with the choice between averting deaths and saving life years.
Main Methods:
- Utilized epidemiological modeling to create semi-quantitative scenarios for drug allocation.
- Compared risk-based (maximum deaths averted) and time-based (maximum life years gained) allocation strategies.
- Surveyed 123 Dutch guideline developers on their preferred allocation distribution.
Main Results:
- Risk-based and time-based allocations yielded different population distributions of the drug.
- Risk-based allocation prioritized the elderly, averting more deaths but gaining fewer life years compared to time-based allocation.
- Guideline developers found the choice dilemmas difficult, with no single priority emerging as dominant.
Conclusions:
- The choice between saving life years or averting deaths in evidence-based resource allocation involves moral considerations due to varying disease risk origins.
- Evidence-based guideline development inherently incorporates moral implications, particularly in resource-constrained scenarios.
- The study highlights the complex ethical landscape of cardiovascular risk management and drug allocation.
Related Concept Videos
Regression Toward the Mean
Guidelines for Writing Outcome
Patient outcomes reflect the patient's response to the goal rather than what the nurse aims to achieve. Terminology should be observable and measurable to avoid the reader's interpretation. The desired outcome should be realistic and achievable in the designated care timeframe. Expected outcomes should align with adjunctive therapies. The outcome should enhance care evaluation by...
Nursing Interventions II: Selecting and Classifying the Nursing Interventions
Guidelines for Nursing Documentation II
Timely documentation is crucial to ensure continuity of care for patients. Any delays in recording or reporting medical information can result in medical errors and even adverse patient outcomes. From medication administration to diagnostic test results, every detail must be accurately and promptly documented to provide the best possible care for patients.
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast, controlled...
Introduction to Epidemiology